• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般内科病房中发生脓毒性休克的患者实施脓毒症复苏捆绑包的依从性和障碍。

Compliance and barriers to implementing the sepsis resuscitation bundle for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Feb;111(2):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2011.01.004
PMID:22370285
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This two-part study aimed to investigate compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle (SRB) and the barriers to its implementation for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards.

METHODS

In the first part, medical records of patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit from the general medical wards due to septic shock were reviewed. Compliance rates with the six SRB components were assessed. In the second part, responsible junior physicians (first-year and second-year residents) in the general wards and senior physicians (third-year residents and fellows) were randomly invited for questionnaire-based interviews.

RESULTS

In the first part, during the 6-month study period, 40 patients were included. Overall compliance with the SRB within 6 h was only 2.5%, mainly due to femoral catheterization (42.5%) and the lack of measuring central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂). Delayed completion of SRB components contributed little to the low compliance rate. In the second part, based on the questionnaire results of 71 junior physicians and 64 senior physicians, the junior physicians were less familiar with the SRB guidelines, particularly regarding the meaning of ScvO₂ (p = 0.01) and management of low ScvO₂ (p = 0.04). Junior physicians were also more reluctant to measure the central venous pressure (CVP; p = 0.04) and the ScvO₂ (p = 0.01), and were also less confident with internal jugular vein or subclavian vein catheterization (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the SRB for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards is very low. Besides providing educational programs to improve awareness and acceptance of the SRB, measures to help in central venous catheterization and completion of SRB may be considered.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究分为两部分,旨在调查普通内科病房发生感染性休克的患者对脓毒症复苏捆绑包(SRB)的依从性及其实施障碍。

方法

在第一部分中,回顾了因感染性休克从普通内科病房转入重症监护病房的患者的病历。评估了 6 个 SRB 组成部分的依从率。在第二部分中,随机邀请普通病房的初级医生(一年级和二年级住院医师)和高级医生(三年级住院医师和研究员)进行基于问卷的访谈。

结果

在第一部分,在 6 个月的研究期间,共纳入 40 名患者。SRB 在 6 小时内的总体依从率仅为 2.5%,主要是由于股静脉置管(42.5%)和缺乏测量中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO₂)所致。SRB 组成部分的延迟完成对低依从率的贡献不大。在第二部分,根据 71 名初级医生和 64 名高级医生的问卷调查结果,初级医生对 SRB 指南的了解较少,特别是关于 ScvO₂的含义(p=0.01)和低 ScvO₂的处理(p=0.04)。初级医生也更不愿意测量中心静脉压(CVP;p=0.04)和 ScvO₂(p=0.01),而且对颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉置管也不太有信心(p<0.001)。

结论

普通内科病房发生感染性休克的患者对 SRB 的依从性非常低。除了提供教育计划以提高对 SRB 的认识和接受度外,还可以考虑采取措施帮助进行中心静脉置管和完成 SRB。

相似文献

1
Compliance and barriers to implementing the sepsis resuscitation bundle for patients developing septic shock in the general medical wards.一般内科病房中发生脓毒性休克的患者实施脓毒症复苏捆绑包的依从性和障碍。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Feb;111(2):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
2
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
3
[Adherence to international guidelines on early management in severe sepsis and septic shock].[遵循严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的国际指南]
Biomedica. 2012 Sep;32(3):449-56. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572012000300015.
4
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
5
Effectiveness of sepsis bundle application in cirrhotic patients with septic shock: a single-center experience.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者中脓毒症集束化治疗的应用效果:单中心经验。
J Crit Care. 2013 Apr;28(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏包管理依从性的因素。
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826eea2b.
7
[A study of rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department].[急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从率研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):138-41.
8
Implementation of early goal-directed therapy and the surviving sepsis campaign resuscitation bundle in Asia.亚洲地区早期目标导向治疗和拯救脓毒症运动复苏捆绑方案的实施情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):452-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs045. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
Current approach to the haemodynamic management of septic shock patients in European intensive care units: a cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire-based survey.目前欧洲重症监护病房感染性休克患者血流动力学管理方法:一项基于横断面、自我报告的问卷调查研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Apr;28(4):284-90. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283405062.
10
[Efficacies of fluid resuscitation as guided by lactate clearance rate and central venous oxygen saturation in patients with septic shock].[乳酸清除率和中心静脉血氧饱和度指导下的液体复苏对感染性休克患者的疗效]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Feb 17;95(7):496-500.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Physician Compliance with Quality Indicators of Septic Shock and Severe Sepsis in Eastern Taiwanese Community Hospital.台湾东部地区社区医院急诊医师对感染性休克和严重脓毒症质量指标的依从性
J Acute Med. 2017 Dec 1;7(4):135-140. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.2017.0704.001.
2
Barriers and facilitators towards implementing the Sepsis Six care bundle (BLISS-1): a mixed methods investigation using the theoretical domains framework.实施败血症六项护理包(BLISS-1)的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架进行的混合方法研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 19;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0437-2.
3
Use of femoral vein catheters for the assessment of perfusion parameters.
使用股静脉导管评估灌注参数。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):168-74. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130029.