Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep 15;106(4):441-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.23081. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
There is no consensus on treatment for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs (T4), but induction multidrug chemotherapy may be a beneficial, especially when surgery is considered as adjuvant treatment.
We classified 169 patients with T4 esophageal cancer without distant metastasis into those undergoing chemotherapy using cisplatin and 5-FU (CF) plus adriamycin or CF plus docetaxel (79 patients) and those undergoing chemoradiotherapy using CF (90 patients). For the former group, chemoradiation was subsequently applied when surgical resection was not indicated.
Thirty-four patients in the chemotherapy group (43.0%) received chemoradiotherapy following chemotherapy. Although the response rate tended to be higher in the chemoradiotherapy group, there was no significant difference in the response rate between the groups (63.3% vs. 68.9%). Esophageal perforation during treatment was more frequent among the chemoradiotherapy group than the chemotherapy group (16.7% vs. 6.3%, P=0.0379). The rate of surgical resection was consequently higher for the induction chemotherapy group compared to the chemoradiotherapy group (72.1% vs. 45.6%, P=0.0005).
Induction triplet chemotherapy reduced esophageal perforation and increased the resectability of T4 esophageal cancers by combining second-line chemoradiotherapy. This strategy might increase the chance of curative resection for patients with T4 esophageal cancer.
对于侵犯邻近器官的食管癌(T4),目前尚无统一的治疗方法,但诱导多药化疗可能是有益的,尤其是在考虑手术作为辅助治疗时。
我们将 169 例无远处转移的 T4 食管癌患者分为接受顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(CF)联合阿霉素或 CF 联合多西他赛(79 例)化疗组和接受 CF 同期放化疗(90 例)组。对于前者,当手术切除不适用时,随后进行放化疗。
化疗组 34 例(43.0%)患者在化疗后接受放化疗。尽管放化疗组的缓解率倾向较高,但两组间缓解率无显著差异(63.3% vs. 68.9%)。放化疗组治疗期间食管穿孔的发生率高于化疗组(16.7% vs. 6.3%,P=0.0379)。因此,诱导化疗组的手术切除率高于放化疗组(72.1% vs. 45.6%,P=0.0005)。
三药诱导化疗通过联合二线放化疗降低了食管穿孔的发生率,提高了 T4 食管癌的可切除性。这种策略可能增加 T4 食管癌患者获得根治性切除的机会。