Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Apr;122(4):930-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.23187. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the accuracy of established obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) questionnaires based on presenting symptoms and complaints as screening tools for OSAS in Treacher-Collins syndrome (TCS).
Cross-sectional cohort study.
In 35 TCS patients (13 children, 22 adults) in whom diagnostic polysomnographic results on OSAS were available, the Brouillette score was evaluated in children and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in adults.
The total Brouillette score showed a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 71%, and positive and negative predictive values of 60% and 63%, respectively. The answer "No" to the question as to whether a child snored could rule out OSAS in children, and showed positive and negative predictive values of 55% and 100%, respectively. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale showed a sensitivity of 0%, specificity of 92%, and positive and negative predictive values of 0% and 57%, respectively. A positive answer to the question of whether a person falls asleep while sitting and talking to someone (sometimes or more) was able to predict OSAS in adults; this question had positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 72%, respectively.
This cross-sectional cohort study showed that the Brouillette score and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale are of minimal usefulness in TCS. Diagnosis of OSAS based solely on complaints is not reliable, probably due to habituation. Therefore, for a good evaluation and optimal multidisciplinary treatment of this chronic disease in TCS, all newly referred pediatric and adult TCS patients should be screened for OSAS at least once with polysomnography.
目的/假设:本研究评估了基于症状和主诉的已建立的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)问卷作为特发性颅面骨发育不全(TCS)患者 OSAS 的筛查工具的准确性。
横断面队列研究。
在 35 例 TCS 患者(13 例儿童,22 例成人)中,这些患者均有诊断性多导睡眠图(PSG)检查 OSAS 的结果,对儿童评估了 Brouillette 评分,对成人评估了 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)。
总 Brouillette 评分的敏感性为 50%,特异性为 71%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 60%和 63%。对于儿童是否打鼾的问题回答“否”可以排除儿童的 OSAS,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 55%和 100%。ESS 的敏感性为 0%,特异性为 92%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 0%和 57%。回答“有时或经常”在与人交谈时坐着入睡的问题能够预测成人的 OSAS,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 100%和 72%。
本横断面队列研究表明,Brouillette 评分和 ESS 在 TCS 中的作用很小。仅基于主诉诊断 OSAS 不可靠,这可能是由于习惯。因此,为了对 TCS 中这种慢性疾病进行良好的评估和最佳的多学科治疗,所有新转诊的儿科和成人 TCS 患者都应至少使用 PSG 筛查一次 OSAS。