Suppr超能文献

患者的幻听与非患者的幻听有何不同?

How do auditory verbal hallucinations in patients differ from those in non-patients?

作者信息

Larøi Frank

机构信息

Department of Psychology: Cognition and Behaviour, University of Liège Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 21;6:25. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00025. eCollection 2012.

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are experienced by individuals with various clinical diagnoses, such as psychosis, but also a significant minority of healthy individuals from the general population may experience them. Although much research has been carried out the past few decades, the mechanisms and factors underlying the emergence of AVHs is still poorly understood. One way of clarifying this issue involves comparing AVHs in patient and non-patient populations. In particular, differences between these groups will provide important information concerning the emergence of AVHs. After a general presentation and discussion of the notion of a continuum hypothesis, studies comparing patients with non-patients experiencing AVHs will be reviewed. This will comprise studies examining the phenomenological characteristics of AVHs in addition to neuroimaging and cognitive studies. Although we are beginning to elucidate important differences on a phenomenological level between these two types of AVHs, far too few studies have directly compared patient and non-patient AVHs in terms of underlying cerebral correlates and cognitive mechanisms. Nevertheless, and based on recent research on phenomenological differences, two issues stand out that need to be addressed, namely, the highly negative emotional content of AVHs in patients and the early onset of AVHs in non-patients populations. Suggestions for future research will be discussed.

摘要

各种临床诊断的个体都会经历听幻觉(AVH),比如患有精神病的个体,但普通人群中也有相当一部分健康个体可能会经历听幻觉。尽管在过去几十年里已经开展了大量研究,但听幻觉出现的机制和因素仍未得到很好的理解。澄清这个问题的一种方法是比较患者群体和非患者群体中的听幻觉。特别是,这些群体之间的差异将为听幻觉的出现提供重要信息。在对连续统假设的概念进行一般性介绍和讨论之后,将对比较有听幻觉的患者和非患者的研究进行综述。这将包括除神经影像学和认知研究之外,考察听幻觉现象学特征的研究。尽管我们开始在现象学层面阐明这两种听幻觉之间的重要差异,但直接比较患者和非患者听幻觉在潜在大脑关联和认知机制方面的研究却太少了。然而,基于最近关于现象学差异的研究,有两个突出问题需要解决,即患者听幻觉中高度负面的情绪内容以及非患者群体中听幻觉的早期发作。将讨论对未来研究的建议。

相似文献

4
Understanding auditory verbal hallucinations: a systematic review of current evidence.理解幻听:当前证据的系统综述
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 May;133(5):352-67. doi: 10.1111/acps.12531. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
7
Investigating the lateralisation of experimentally induced auditory verbal hallucinations.探究实验诱导性幻听的偏侧化
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 6;17:1193402. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1193402. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

10
Measurement practices in hallucinations research.幻觉研究中的测量实践。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2022 Mar-May;27(2-3):183-198. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2021.1999224. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

7
The role of emotion regulation in auditory hallucinations.情绪调节在幻听中的作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Feb 28;185(3):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
9
Impaired verbal self-monitoring in individuals at high risk of psychosis.言语自我监测受损与精神病高危个体。
Psychol Med. 2010 Sep;40(9):1433-42. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991991. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
10
Emotion regulation strategies in patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的情绪调节策略。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验