Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Health Policy Research Department, Palo Alto, California 94301, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(4):230-4. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.091118-QUAN-368.
To examine associations between pay for performance (P4P) and recommended cessation counseling among primary care practices (PCPs).
Cross-sectional survey of 89 PCPs participating in a joint Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)-Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health promotion initiative.
100% response rate from PCPs participating in the RWJF-AHRQ initiative.
Survey data on cessation counseling, practice involvement with P4P, practice size, public reporting of performance, practice competition, linkages with community resources, integration of evidence-based guidelines, patient recommendations for cessation, and state-specific smoking rates.
Logistic regression was used to examine associations between practice involvement with P4P and cessation counseling offered by PCPs. Practice characteristics, including size and availability of other cessation services, were included in the analysis.
Practices that were involved with P4P had greater odds of offering recommended cessation counseling (odds ratio [OR] = 27.6, p < .01). Practices that linked patients to community resources, experienced greater competition, and were larger in size also provided more counseling (p < .05). Publicly reporting performance information and being located in states with higher smoking rates were associated with decreased odds of offering counseling support (p < .10).
Findings suggest that P4P is associated with recommended counseling for smoking cessation. Study limitations include small sample size and unavailability of information on the magnitude of P4P incentives and program design. Further analysis considering these programmatic details is warranted.
研究按绩效付费(P4P)与初级保健机构(PCP)推荐戒烟咨询之间的关联。
对参加罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会(RWJF)-医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)健康促进计划的 89 名 PCP 进行横断面调查。
RWJF-AHRQ 计划参与者的 100%回复率。
关于戒烟咨询、实践参与 P4P、实践规模、绩效公开报告、实践竞争、与社区资源的联系、循证指南的整合、患者对戒烟的建议以及特定州的吸烟率的调查数据。
使用逻辑回归来研究 PCP 参与 P4P 与 PCP 提供的戒烟咨询之间的关联。分析中包括实践特征,包括规模和其他戒烟服务的可用性。
参与 P4P 的实践提供推荐的戒烟咨询的可能性更高(优势比[OR] = 27.6,p <.01)。与社区资源联系患者、竞争更激烈、规模更大的实践也提供了更多的咨询(p <.05)。公开报告绩效信息和位于吸烟率较高的州与提供咨询支持的可能性降低相关(p <.10)。
研究结果表明,P4P 与推荐的戒烟咨询相关。研究的局限性包括样本量小,以及无法获得 P4P 激励和计划设计的规模信息。进一步分析考虑这些计划细节是有必要的。