Cosyn Jan, De Bruyn Hugo, Cleymaet Roberto
Periodontist, University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; periodontist, visiting professor, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dental Medicine, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium; periodontist, professor, University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; prosthodontist, professor, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dental Medicine, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):847-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00448.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
(1) To document soft tissue aspects using a specific protocol for immediate implant treatment (IIT) following single-tooth removal; (2) to evaluate whether this protocol allows preservation of pink aesthetics as objectively assessed.
Patients with a thick gingival biotype and intact buccal bone wall upon extraction of a single tooth in the aesthetic zone (15-25) were consecutively treated. The protocol included flapless extraction and implant surgery, socket grafting, immediate nonocclusal loading with a screw-retained provisional crown, and replacement by a permanent crown 6 months thereafter. The outcome was assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months. Cases demonstrating major alveolar process remodeling and/or advanced midfacial recession (>1 mm) at 3 months were additionally treated with a connective tissue graft (CTG). The emergence profile of the provisional crown was replicated for all permanent crowns.
Twenty-two patients (12 men, 10 women; mean age 50) were treated after tooth extraction for nonperiodontal reasons using a novel bone condensing implant with variable-thread design, conical connection, and platform switch (NobelActive®, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden). One implant failed and mean marginal bone loss was 0.1 mm (p = .059). Temporary mesial papilla reduction occurred, whereas distal papilla reduction was permanent (mean 0.5 mm; p = .001). At 3 months, five cases demonstrated major alveolar process remodeling and two advanced midfacial recession. Hence, slight initial decline in the pink esthetic score (PES) (p = .053) was observed. CTG resulted in a steady improvement of the PES after 3 months (p ≤ .037). At 12 months, pink aesthetics (mean PES 12.15) was comparable to the preoperative status (mean PES 11.86; p = .293). Distal papillae had significantly deteriorated (p = .020) in this time span, whereas midfacial contour had significantly improved (p = .005).
Preservation of pink aesthetics is possible following IIT. However, to achieve that, CTG may be necessary in about one-third of the patients. Major alveolar process remodeling is the main reason for additional treatment.
(1)使用特定方案记录单颗牙拔除后即刻种植治疗(IIT)的软组织情况;(2)评估该方案是否能如客观评估那样保留粉色美学效果。
对美学区域(15 - 25)单颗牙拔除时牙龈生物型厚且颊侧骨壁完整的患者进行连续治疗。该方案包括不翻瓣拔牙和种植手术、牙槽窝植骨、用螺丝固位的临时冠进行即刻非咬合加载,6个月后更换为永久冠。在3个月、6个月和12个月后评估结果。3个月时出现主要牙槽突重塑和/或面部中部明显退缩(>1 mm)的病例额外进行结缔组织移植(CTG)治疗。所有永久冠均复制临时冠的龈缘轮廓。
22例患者(12例男性,10例女性;平均年龄50岁)因非牙周原因拔牙后,使用一种新型的具有可变螺纹设计、锥形连接和平台转换的骨压缩种植体(NobelActive®,诺贝尔生物科技公司,瑞典哥德堡)进行治疗。1枚种植体失败,平均边缘骨吸收为0.1 mm(p = 0.059)。近中乳头出现暂时性退缩,而远中乳头退缩是永久性的(平均0.5 mm;p = 0.001)。3个月时,5例出现主要牙槽突重塑,2例出现面部中部明显退缩。因此,观察到粉色美学评分(PES)略有初始下降(p = 0.053)。CTG导致3个月后PES稳步改善(p≤0.037)。12个月时,粉色美学效果(平均PES 12.15)与术前状态相当(平均PES 11.86;p = 0.293)。在此时间段内,远中乳头明显恶化(p = 0.020),而面部中部轮廓明显改善(p = 0.005)。
IIT后保留粉色美学效果是可能的。然而,要实现这一点,约三分之一的患者可能需要进行CTG。主要牙槽突重塑是额外治疗的主要原因。