Tavelli Lorenzo, Barootchi Shayan
Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
School of Dentistry, Universidad Catolica de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):562-586. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0119. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
The aim of the present review was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of soft tissue dehiscences at implant sites in absence of disease, together with the related risk and protective factors.
A systematic search was conducted to identify cross-sectional and prospective studies reporting information on soft tissue dehiscences. Mixed-effects uni- and multi-level regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors associated with these conditions.
A total of 221 eligible studies were included. Soft tissue dehiscences ("recessions") were identified as peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences (PSTDs), Mucosal level (ML) apical shifts, and mucosal recessions (MRECs). The mean prevalence of PSTD and MREC was 46.2% and 23.1%, respectively. The incidence of PSTD, MREC, and apical shift of ML within 5 years following loading was up to 38.3%, 47.8%, and 23.6%, respectively. Limited mucosal thickness (MT), immediate implant therapy, and lack of peri-implant soft tissue augmentation were risk factors for PSTD, while limited MT, lack of/limited keratinized mucosa (KM) width, and immediate implant therapy were risk factors for ML apical shift. Guided implant surgery, bone grafting at implant placement, soft tissue augmentation, and adequate KM and MT were protective factors for the stability of ML. Lack of/limited KM width and interproximal marginal bone loss were risk factors for MREC.
Soft tissue dehiscences are commonly observed at implant sites. Risk and protective factors associated with PSTD, ML apical shift, and MREC were identified. A new diagnostic system and format for assessing and reporting soft tissue dehiscence at implant sites was proposed.
The aim of the present review was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of soft tissue recession ("gum loss") at healthy implant sites. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies reporting information on soft tissue recession at implant sites. The statistical analysis also explored correlations of different factors with soft tissue recession. A total of 221 studies were included. Soft tissue dehiscences ("recession") were identified as peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences (PSTDs), Mucosal Level (ML) apical shift, and mucosal recessions (MRECs). The prevalence of soft tissue recession was, on average, 46.2%. The factors associated with this condition were thin soft tissue, lack of a band of keratinized tissue, and lack of a soft tissue graft surgery at the time of implant placement. On the other hand, placing dental implants using a surgical guide, performing bone grafting and soft tissue grafting at the time of implant placement, and having adequate thickness and keratinization of the soft tissue were protective factors reducing the risk of recession.
本综述的目的是评估在无疾病情况下种植体部位软组织裂开的患病率和发病率,以及相关的风险和保护因素。
进行系统检索以识别报告软组织裂开信息的横断面研究和前瞻性研究。进行混合效应单水平和多水平回归分析以确定与这些情况相关的预测因素。
共纳入221项符合条件的研究。软组织裂开(“退缩”)被确定为种植体周围软组织裂开(PSTD)、黏膜水平(ML)根尖移位和黏膜退缩(MREC)。PSTD和MREC的平均患病率分别为46.2%和23.1%。加载后5年内PSTD、MREC和ML根尖移位的发生率分别高达38.3%、47.8%和23.6%。黏膜厚度(MT)有限、即刻种植治疗以及缺乏种植体周围软组织增量是PSTD的危险因素,而MT有限、角化黏膜(KM)宽度缺乏/有限以及即刻种植治疗是ML根尖移位的危险因素。引导式种植手术、种植时植骨、软组织增量以及足够的KM和MT是ML稳定性的保护因素。KM宽度缺乏/有限和邻间边缘骨丢失是MREC的危险因素。
种植体部位常见软组织裂开。确定了与PSTD、ML根尖移位和MREC相关的风险和保护因素。提出了一种用于评估和报告种植体部位软组织裂开的新诊断系统和形式。
本综述的目的是评估健康种植体部位软组织退缩(“牙龈丧失”)的患病率和发病率。进行系统检索以识别报告种植体部位软组织退缩信息的研究。统计分析还探讨了不同因素与软组织退缩的相关性。共纳入221项研究。软组织裂开(“退缩”)被确定为种植体周围软组织裂开(PSTD)、黏膜水平(ML)根尖移位和黏膜退缩(MREC)。软组织退缩的患病率平均为46.2%。与这种情况相关的因素包括软组织薄、缺乏角化组织带以及种植时缺乏软组织移植手术。另一方面,使用手术导板植入牙种植体、种植时进行植骨和软组织移植以及软组织具有足够的厚度和角化是降低退缩风险的保护因素。