Pei Xiao-Hua, He Juan, Liu Qiao, Zhu Bei, Bao Li-Hua, Yan Chen-Jing, Wu Jian-Qing, Zhao Wei-Hong
Division of Nephrology, Department of Geriatrics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;46(3):223-31. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.660985. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a selection of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C in a Chinese population.
Estimated GFR values from 10 equations were compared with reference GFR (rGFR) from the (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. The study enrolled 569 Chinese participants (41.5% women, 53.5 ± 16.9 years, range 19-92 years), with mean rGFR 74.80 ± 26.10 (range 9.8-146.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2)).
Bland-Altman analysis illustrated that the 95% agreement limits of all the equations surpassed the acceptable tolerance (<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), of which the MacIsaac equation was the closest one, reaching 71.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Linear regression analysis also demonstrated a consistent result. When assessed in all participants, the accuracy of the six equations reached and exceeded the acceptable level (≥70%), of which the Shanghai and MacIsaac equations gained more accuracy than others. When compared in subgroups, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), MacIsaac and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations were optimal for rGFR stages ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and < 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.
The results demonstrated that further improvement is needed for the selected 10 equations. Not all the cystatin C equations were superior to SCr equations. They have their own applicability at various GFR levels. At present, the CKD-EPI, MacIsaac and CG equations may be applied to evaluate GFR in normal, mild to moderate and severe kidney function, respectively.
本研究旨在评估一系列基于血清肌酐(SCr)和血清胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程在中国人群中的适用性。
将10个方程估算的GFR值与采用(99m)Tc-DTPA肾动态显像法测得的参考GFR(rGFR)进行比较。该研究纳入了569名中国参与者(女性占41.5%,年龄53.5±16.9岁,范围19 - 92岁),平均rGFR为74.80±26.10(范围9.8 - 146.8 ml/min/1.73 m²)。
Bland-Altman分析表明,所有方程的95%一致性界限均超过了可接受的公差范围(<60 ml/min/1.73 m²),其中MacIsaac方程最接近,达到71.7 ml/min/1.73 m²。线性回归分析也得出了一致的结果。在所有参与者中进行评估时,6个方程的准确性达到并超过了可接受水平(≥70%),其中上海方程和MacIsaac方程比其他方程的准确性更高。在亚组比较中,慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程、MacIsaac方程和Cockcroft-Gault(CG)方程分别在rGFR≥90 ml/min/1.73 m²、30 - 89 ml/min/1.73 m²和<30 ml/min/1.73 m²阶段表现最佳。
结果表明,所选的10个方程需要进一步改进。并非所有的胱抑素C方程都优于SCr方程。它们在不同的GFR水平有各自的适用性。目前,CKD-EPI方程、MacIsaac方程和CG方程可能分别适用于评估正常、轻至中度和重度肾功能的GFR。