Suppr超能文献

大肠左侧吻合术的吻合钉合或缝合。

Stapling or suturing for anastomoses of the left side of the large intestine.

作者信息

Friend P J, Scott R, Everett W G, Scott I H

机构信息

Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Nov;171(5):373-6.

PMID:2237720
Abstract

Two hundred and fifty patients undergoing elective surgical treatment involving anastomoses of the left side of the colon or colon and rectum have been studied in a randomized trial in which the EEA (U. S. Surgical Corp.) circular stapler has been compared with single layer sutured anastomoses. Only patients in whom either technique was feasible were included in the analysis. The operative techniques were largely standardized. Patients were studied by means of a limited barium enema on the ninth or tenth postoperative day. The data have been analyzed for leakage rate (clinical and roentgenologic), other complications and degree of experience of the surgeon. Eleven patients were excluded from the analysis because the selected technique could not be carried out; of these, eight were in the stapled group in which it was possible to perform a sutured anastomosis. There were no instances in which it was possible to staple but not possible to suture. The remaining three exclusions were patients in whom either a coloanal anastomosis or a Hartmann procedure was performed. There was no over-all difference in the leakage rate--roentgenologic, clinical or total--between the two groups. However, when analyzed by the surgeon, the clinical leakage rate for surgeons in training was greater for sutured anastomoses than for stapled anastomoses (p = 0.053). Thus, it appears that the benefits of experience are more pronounced for sutured anastomoses but that, in experienced hands, neither technique is superior.

摘要

在一项随机试验中,对250例接受涉及结肠左侧或结肠与直肠吻合的择期手术治疗的患者进行了研究,其中将EEA(美国外科公司)圆形吻合器与单层缝合吻合术进行了比较。仅将两种技术均可行的患者纳入分析。手术技术在很大程度上实现了标准化。在术后第9天或第10天通过有限的钡灌肠对患者进行研究。对数据进行了分析,包括漏率(临床和放射学)、其他并发症以及外科医生的经验程度。11例患者被排除在分析之外,因为所选技术无法实施;其中,8例在吻合器组,在该组可以进行缝合吻合。不存在可以使用吻合器但无法进行缝合的情况。其余3例被排除的患者是接受了结肠肛管吻合术或哈特曼手术的患者。两组之间在漏率方面——放射学、临床或总体漏率——没有总体差异。然而,按外科医生进行分析时,实习外科医生缝合吻合术的临床漏率高于吻合器吻合术(p = 0.053)。因此,似乎经验对缝合吻合术的益处更为明显,但在经验丰富的医生手中,两种技术都不具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验