Centre de Recherche de l'Institut, Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.011. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Mentalizing deficits have often been observed in people with schizophrenia and a few recent studies suggest that such deficits are also present in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP). It is not clear, however, whether these mentalizing deficits in FEP can be accounted for by underlying processes such as social cue recognition, social knowledge and general reasoning. In this study, we assessed mentalizing abilities in 31 people with FEP and 31 matched controls using a novel, comprehensive mentalizing task validated through the present study. We also assessed social cue recognition, social knowledge and non-social (or general) reasoning performance in the same participants in order to determine if the mentalizing deficits in FEP can be at least partly explained by performance in these three underlying processes. Overall, the mentalizing task revealed the greatest impairment in FEP, an impairment that remained significant even after controlling for social cue recognition, social knowledge and non-social reasoning performance. Interestingly, non-social reasoning and social knowledge were both shown to contribute to mentalizing performance. In addition, social cognition measures were linked to social functioning in the FEP group, with the strongest correlation observed with mentalizing performance. Taken together, these results show that mentalizing is an aspect of social cognition that is particularly affected in FEP and might contribute to functional impairments in these patients. These deficits could be a prime target for cognitive remediation in FEP, and our results suggest that this could be done either directly or through improvement of related social and non-social cognitive skills such as social knowledge and general reasoning.
精神分裂症患者常存在心理理论缺陷,最近的一些研究表明,首发精神病患者(FEP)也存在这种缺陷。然而,尚不清楚 FEP 中的这些心理理论缺陷是否可以归因于潜在的过程,如社会线索识别、社会知识和一般推理。在这项研究中,我们使用一种新的、通过本研究验证的全面心理理论任务,评估了 31 名 FEP 患者和 31 名匹配对照者的心理理论能力。我们还评估了同一参与者的社会线索识别、社会知识和非社会(或一般)推理表现,以确定 FEP 中的心理理论缺陷是否至少部分可以通过这些三个潜在过程的表现来解释。总的来说,心理理论任务显示 FEP 中存在最大的损伤,即使在控制了社会线索识别、社会知识和非社会推理表现后,这种损伤仍然显著。有趣的是,非社会推理和社会知识都被证明对心理理论表现有贡献。此外,社会认知测量与 FEP 组的社会功能相关,与心理理论表现的相关性最强。综上所述,这些结果表明,心理理论是社会认知中特别受 FEP 影响的一个方面,可能导致这些患者的功能障碍。这些缺陷可能是 FEP 认知矫正的主要目标,我们的结果表明,可以直接进行认知矫正,也可以通过改善相关的社会和非社会认知技能,如社会知识和一般推理来进行。