Montreuil Tina, Bodnar Michael, Bertrand Marie-Claude, Malla Ashok K, Joober Ridha, Lepage Martin
Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses (PEPP-Montreal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2010 Jul;4(2):105-14. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.4.2.2.
In psychotic disorders, impairments in cognition have been associated with both clinical and functional outcome, while deficits in social cognition have been associated with functional outcome. As an extension to a recent report on neurocognition and short-term clinical outcome in first-episode psychosis (FEP), the current study explored whether social cognitive deficits could also identify poor short-term clinical outcome among FEP patients.
We defined the social-cognition domain based on the scores from the Hinting Task and the Four Factor Tests of Social Intelligence. Data were collected in 45 FEP patients and 26 healthy controls. The patients were divided into good- and poor-outcome groups based on clinical data at six months following initiation of treatment. Social cognition was compared among 27 poor-outcome, 18 good-outcome, and 26 healthy-control participants.
Outcome groups significantly differed in the social cognition domain (z-scores: poor outcome=-2.0 [SD=1.4]; good outcome=-1.0 [SD=1.0]; p=0.005), with both groups scoring significantly lower than the control group (p<0.003). Moreover, outcome groups differed significantly only on the Cartoon Predictions subtest (z-scores: poor outcome=-2.7 [SD=2.7]; good outcome=-0.7 [SD=1.8]; p=0.001) among the five subtests used.
Overall, social cognition appears to be compromised in all FEP patients compared to healthy controls. More interestingly, significant differences in social cognitive impairments exist between good and poor short-term clinical outcome groups, with the largest effect found in the Cartoon Predictions subtest.
在精神障碍中,认知损害与临床及功能结局均有关联,而社会认知缺陷则与功能结局相关。作为对近期关于首发精神病(FEP)患者神经认知与短期临床结局报告的拓展,本研究探讨了社会认知缺陷是否也能识别FEP患者中的不良短期临床结局。
我们根据暗示任务和社会智力四因素测试的得分来定义社会认知领域。收集了45例FEP患者和26名健康对照者的数据。根据治疗开始后六个月的临床数据,将患者分为结局良好组和结局不良组。对27例结局不良、18例结局良好和26名健康对照参与者的社会认知进行了比较。
结局组在社会认知领域存在显著差异(z分数:结局不良=-2.0 [标准差=1.4];结局良好=-1.0 [标准差=1.0];p=0.005),两组得分均显著低于对照组(p<0.003)。此外,在所用的五个子测试中,结局组仅在卡通预测子测试上存在显著差异(z分数:结局不良=-2.7 [标准差=2.7];结局良好=-0.7 [标准差=1.8];p=0.001)。
总体而言,与健康对照相比,所有FEP患者的社会认知似乎都受到了损害。更有趣的是,短期临床结局良好组和不良组之间在社会认知损害方面存在显著差异,在卡通预测子测试中发现的影响最大。