• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中预防性抗生素的变化:宋卡纳加拉医院的观点。

Variation of prophylactic antibiotic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Songklanagarind Hospital perspective.

作者信息

Ruangsin Sakchai, Wanasuwannakul Thunchanok

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jan;95(1):48-51.

PMID:22379741
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effectiveness of variation of prophylactic antibiotic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective data review was undertaken of patients who received a laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008 in Songklanagarind Hospital. The prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI), the variation of antibiotic prescription, and associated factors with SSI were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty nine patients received a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The prophylactic antibiotic was utilized in 328 patients (74.7%). Cefazolin was the most common antibiotic used. Only 3 patients (0.9%) received the antibiotic according to the recommendation of center for disease control and prevention (CDC). The SSI was accounted in 41 patients (9.3%); 29 had the prophylactic antibiotic, while 12 did not. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between the two groups (p = 0.54). Factor significantly associated with SSI was the operative time more than three hours (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Various patterns of prophylactic antibiotic were encountered. The practice variation seemed to be ineffective in the prevention of SSI. The selectively risk factors should be considered in the antibiotic prophylaxis.

摘要

目的

评估预防性抗生素在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用变化的有效性。

材料与方法

对2005年1月1日至2008年12月31日在宋卡纳卡林医院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行回顾性数据审查。回顾并分析手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率、抗生素处方的变化以及与SSI相关的因素。

结果

439例患者成功接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。328例患者(74.7%)使用了预防性抗生素。头孢唑林是最常用的抗生素。只有3例患者(0.9%)根据疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的建议使用了抗生素。41例患者(9.3%)发生了SSI;29例使用了预防性抗生素,12例未使用。两组之间SSI的发生率无统计学显著差异(p = )。与SSI显著相关的因素是手术时间超过3小时(p = 0.03)。

结论

遇到了多种预防性抗生素使用模式。这种实践差异在预防SSI方面似乎无效。在抗生素预防中应考虑选择性危险因素。

相似文献

1
Variation of prophylactic antibiotic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Songklanagarind Hospital perspective.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中预防性抗生素的变化:宋卡纳加拉医院的观点。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jan;95(1):48-51.
2
The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.预防性抗生素对择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后感染并发症的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):721-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.050.
3
Prescribing practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 commonly performed surgeries in a teaching hospital in Brazil.巴西一家教学医院中3种常见手术的抗生素预防性用药情况
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Jun;27(3):296-300. doi: 10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a96193.
4
Risk of surgical site infection and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis: a cohort study of appendectomy patients in Thailand.手术部位感染风险及抗生素预防效果:泰国阑尾炎切除术患者队列研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jul 12;6:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-111.
5
A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中抗生素预防用药的重新评估:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Jan;84(1):105-8.
6
Routine Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Does Not Reduce the Risk of Surgical Site Infections.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间常规使用预防性抗生素并不能降低手术部位感染的风险。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;18(5):603-609. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.265. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
The efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.头孢唑林在减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术中手术部位感染的疗效:一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):874-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3745-x. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
8
Standardized incidence rates of surgical site infection: a multicenter study in Thailand.手术部位感染的标准化发病率:泰国的一项多中心研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Dec;33(10):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.012.
9
Routine administration of antibiotics to patients suffering accidental gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not necessary.在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,对意外发生胆囊穿孔的患者常规使用抗生素并无必要。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Dec;18(6):547-50. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181809e72.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis and incisional surgical site infection following colorectal cancer surgery: an analysis of 330 cases.结直肠癌手术后的抗生素预防与手术切口部位感染:330例病例分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Jan;92(1):12-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性抗生素在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Aug;22(3):231-247. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.3.231. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
The efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.头孢唑林在减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术中手术部位感染的疗效:一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):874-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3745-x. Epub 2014 Jul 23.