• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性评估局部前列腺癌调强放疗与质子治疗随机对照试验中患者参与意愿。

Prospective preference assessment of patients' willingness to participate in a randomized controlled trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.072. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.072
PMID:22381899
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate patients' willingness to participate (WTP) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We undertook a qualitative research study in which we prospectively enrolled patients with clinically localized PCa. We used purposive sampling to ensure a diverse sample based on age, race, travel distance, and physician. Patients participated in a semi-structured interview in which they reviewed a description of a hypothetical RCT, were asked open-ended and focused follow-up questions regarding their motivations for and concerns about enrollment, and completed a questionnaire assessing characteristics such as demographics and prior knowledge of IMRT or PBT. Patients' stated WTP was assessed using a 6-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Forty-six eligible patients (33 white, 13 black) were enrolled from the practices of eight physicians. We identified 21 factors that impacted patients' WTP, which largely centered on five major themes: altruism/desire to compare treatments, randomization, deference to physician opinion, financial incentives, and time demands/scheduling. Most patients (27 of 46, 59%) stated they would either "definitely" or "probably" participate. Seventeen percent (8 of 46) stated they would "definitely not" or "probably not" enroll, most of whom (6 of 8) preferred PBT before their physician visit.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients indicated high WTP in a RCT comparing IMRT and PBT for PCa.

摘要

目的

调查患者参与一项比较前列腺癌调强放疗(IMRT)和质子束放疗(PBT)的随机对照试验(RCT)的意愿(WTP)。

方法和材料

我们进行了一项定性研究,前瞻性地招募了患有临床局限性前列腺癌的患者。我们采用了目的性抽样,以确保根据年龄、种族、旅行距离和医生的不同,样本具有多样性。患者参加了半结构化访谈,他们在访谈中查看了一个假设性 RCT 的描述,被问及关于参与的动机和顾虑的开放性和针对性后续问题,并完成了一份评估人口统计学特征和对 IMRT 或 PBT 了解程度等特征的问卷。患者的 WTP 是使用 6 分李克特量表评估的。

结果

从 8 位医生的诊所共招募了 46 名符合条件的患者(33 名白人,13 名黑人)。我们确定了 21 个影响患者 WTP 的因素,这些因素主要集中在五个主要主题上:利他主义/比较治疗的愿望、随机化、对医生意见的尊重、经济激励和时间需求/安排。大多数患者(46 名中的 27 名,59%)表示他们“肯定”或“可能”会参与。17%(46 名中的 8 名)表示他们“肯定不会”或“可能不会”参与,其中大多数(8 名中的 6 名)在就诊前更喜欢 PBT。

结论

相当一部分患者表示愿意参与比较前列腺癌 IMRT 和 PBT 的 RCT。

相似文献

1
Prospective preference assessment of patients' willingness to participate in a randomized controlled trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.前瞻性评估局部前列腺癌调强放疗与质子治疗随机对照试验中患者参与意愿。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.072. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
2
Hypertensive patients' willingness to participate in placebo-controlled trials: implications for recruitment efficiency.高血压患者参与安慰剂对照试验的意愿:对招募效率的影响。
Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):985-92. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00507-6.
3
Comparing bowel and urinary domains of patient-reported quality of life at the end of and 3 months post radiotherapy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.比较局部前列腺癌调强放疗和质子束放疗结束时和放疗后 3 个月患者报告的生活质量中肠道和泌尿领域。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7925-7934. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3414. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting.比较质子束疗法与调强放疗在前列腺癌术后治疗中的毒性结果。
Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4278-4293. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32457. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Early and late side effects, dosimetric parameters and quality of life after proton beam therapy and IMRT for prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.质子束治疗和调强放射治疗前列腺癌的早晚期副作用、剂量学参数和生活质量:配对分析。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Jun;58(6):916-925. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1581373. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.一项关于前列腺癌质子治疗和调强放射治疗后毒性结果的病例对照研究。
Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):1118-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29148. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Motivations of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to participate in randomized clinical trials.肺动脉高压患者参与随机临床试验的动机。
Clin Trials. 2012 Jun;9(3):348-57. doi: 10.1177/1740774512438981. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
8
Patient perceptions and willingness to participate in clinical trials.患者对临床试验的认知和参与意愿。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(3):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Physician evaluation of internet health information on proton therapy for prostate cancer.医生对前列腺癌质子治疗的互联网健康信息的评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):e173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.039. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
10
Exploring Value From the Patient's Perspective Between Modern Radiation Therapy Modalities for Localized Prostate Cancer.探讨局部前列腺癌现代放射治疗模式下从患者角度的价值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 1;97(3):516-525. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances and Challenges in Conducting Clinical Trials With Proton Beam Therapy.质子束治疗临床试验的进展与挑战。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct;33(4):407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.006.
2
Experiences of participants in a clinical trial of a novel radioactive treatment for advanced prostate cancer: A nested, qualitative longitudinal study.一种新型放射性治疗晚期前列腺癌的临床试验中参与者的体验:一项嵌套式、定性纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0276063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276063. eCollection 2022.
3
A Brief Hope Intervention to Increase Hope Level and Improve Well-Being in Rehabilitating Cancer Patients: A Feasibility Test.
一项旨在提高康复期癌症患者希望水平并改善其幸福感的简短希望干预措施:一项可行性测试。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 May 8;5:2377960819844381. doi: 10.1177/2377960819844381. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.决定参加癌症试验:定性研究的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Oct 27;13:1257-1281. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S266281. eCollection 2020.
5
A pilot randomized trial of five financial incentive strategies to increase study enrollment and retention rates.一项关于五种经济激励策略以提高研究招募率和保留率的试点随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 4;15:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100390. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Systematic review of methodology used in clinical studies evaluating the benefits of proton beam therapy.评估质子束治疗益处的临床研究中所用方法的系统评价。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul 12;19:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.07.002. eCollection 2019 Nov.
7
Randomized evaluation of trial acceptability by INcentive (RETAIN): Study protocol for two embedded randomized controlled trials.随机评估试验可接受性的激励因素 (RETAIN):两项嵌入式随机对照试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Jan;76:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Will they participate? Predicting patients' response to clinical trial invitations in a pediatric emergency department.他们会参与吗?预测儿科急诊科患者对临床试验邀请的反应。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):671-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv216. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.癌症患者参与临床试验的决策制定:一项对患者关系自主性有影响的综合综述
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Apr;23(4):1169-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2581-9. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
Proton beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer-is the hype (and the cost) justified?质子束放射治疗前列腺癌——这种炒作(和成本)合理吗?
Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Jun;14(3):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0320-2.