Falck Alison J, Escobedo Marilyn B, Baillargeon Jacques G, Villard Lisa G, Gunkel John H
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78229, USA.
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 1):1242-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1242.
Current guidelines of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education have restricted the amount of intensive care experience obtained during pediatric residency. The impact on performing procedures has not been evaluated. To determine the current level of competency in 1 common procedure, we investigated the proficiency of pediatric residents in performing neonatal endotracheal intubation during the academic years 1998-1999 and 2000-2001.
Indication for intubation, number of attempts, and achievement of success were recorded by the respiratory therapist present for the procedure. Each intubation was scored according to the attempt on which intubation was successful. Indications for intubation were categorized as respiratory failure, delivery room resuscitation, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Competency was defined as a successful intubation occurring on the first or second attempt >or=80% of the time. Intubation scores were compared between residents at various stages of training and analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis for significance. Comparisons were then performed to determine percentage success with confidence intervals. We also surveyed previous graduates of the training program not included in the observations for this study and asked them to indicate how frequently they perform intubation in current practice and to assess their own competence in the procedure.
A total of 449 resident procedures were observed during the study periods: 192 by postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents, 126 by PGY-2 residents, and 131 by PGY-3 residents. A total of 35% (160 of 449) of intubation procedures were never successful by pediatric house officers. Intubation was successful on the first or second attempt for 50% of PGY-1 residents (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.6-56.8), 55% of PGY-2 residents (95% CI: 46-63.5), and 62% of PGY-3 residents (95% CI: 53.9-70.7). The third-year residents exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of performing a successful intubation compared with first-year residents. The first-year residents in 1998-1999 showed no improvement by their third year in 2000-2001. Surveys were sent to 56 graduates of our residency program (1998-2000). Completed surveys were received from 31 (66%) of 47. A total of 71% of the respondents are practicing general pediatrics, and 36% attend deliveries or perform intubations. A total of 87% reported that their level of confidence with endotracheal intubation was good or excellent after completion of residency training.
We provide objective and subjective data concerning the proficiency of pediatric residents in performing neonatal endotracheal intubation. None of our resident groups met the specified definition of technical competence, although there was improvement with advancing training level in bivariate analyses. However, graduates of our training program felt confident with their intubation skills in contrast to our objective findings. As exposure to these important skills becomes limited, methods to ensure attainment of technical competency during training may need to be redefined.
研究生医学教育认证委员会的现行指南限制了儿科住院医师培训期间获得的重症监护经验量。其对操作技能的影响尚未得到评估。为确定一项常见操作的当前能力水平,我们调查了1998 - 1999学年和2000 - 2001学年儿科住院医师进行新生儿气管插管的熟练程度。
由参与该操作的呼吸治疗师记录插管指征、尝试次数及成功情况。每次插管根据成功时的尝试次数进行评分。插管指征分为呼吸衰竭、产房复苏和羊水胎粪污染。能力定义为首次或第二次尝试成功的发生率≥80%。比较不同培训阶段住院医师的插管评分,并通过多因素逻辑回归分析其显著性。然后进行比较以确定成功百分比及置信区间。我们还调查了本研究观察对象之外的该培训项目往届毕业生,询问他们在当前临床实践中进行插管的频率,并评估他们自身在该操作方面的能力。
在研究期间共观察到449例住院医师操作:第一年住院医师(PGY - 1)192例,第二年住院医师(PGY - 2)126例,第三年住院医师(PGY - 3)131例。儿科住院医师中共有35%(449例中的160例)插管操作从未成功。PGY - 1住院医师中50%在首次或第二次尝试时成功(95%置信区间[CI]:42.6 - 56.8),PGY - 2住院医师为55%(95%CI:46 - 63.5),PGY - 3住院医师为62%(95%CI:53.9 - 70.7)。与第一年住院医师相比,第三年住院医师成功进行插管的可能性显著更高。1998 - 1999年的第一年住院医师到2000 - 2001年第三年时未显示出进步。向我们住院医师培训项目的56名毕业生(1998 - 2000年)发放了调查问卷。收到了47名中的31名(66%)的完整回复。共有71%的受访者从事普通儿科工作,36%参与分娩或进行插管操作。共有87%的受访者报告称完成住院医师培训后他们对气管插管的信心水平良好或优秀。
我们提供了关于儿科住院医师进行新生儿气管插管熟练程度的客观和主观数据。尽管在双变量分析中随着培训水平的提高有所改善,但我们的住院医师群体均未达到技术能力的指定定义。然而,与我们的客观结果相比,我们培训项目的毕业生对其插管技能感到自信。由于接触这些重要技能的机会变得有限,可能需要重新定义在培训期间确保获得技术能力的方法。