Suppr超能文献

丹麦长处与困难问卷的心理测量学特性:SDQ 在四个不同队列中对超过 70,000 名评估者进行了评估。

Psychometric properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: the SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032025. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural five factor instrument developed to assess emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the psychometric properties for parent and teacher ratings in the Danish version of SDQ for different age groups of boys and girls.

METHODS

The Danish versions of the SDQ were distributed to a total of 71,840 parent and teacher raters of 5-, 7- and 10- to 12-year-old children included in four large scale Danish cohorts. The internal reliability was assessed and exploratory factor analyses were carried out to replicate the originally proposed five factor structure. Mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to differentiate between low, medium and high levels of emotional and behavioural difficulties.

RESULTS

The original five factor structure could be substantially confirmed. The Conduct items however did not solely load on the proposed Conduct scale and the Conduct scale was further contaminated by non-conduct items. Positively worded items tended to load on the Prosocial scale. This was more so the case for teachers than for parents. Parent and teacher means and percentiles were found to be lower compared to British figures but similar to or only slightly lower than those found in the other Nordic countries. The percentiles for girls were generally lower than for boys, markedly so for the teacher hyperactivity ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the usefulness of the SDQ as a screening tool for boys and girls across age groups and raters in the general Danish population.

摘要

背景

《长处与困难问卷》(SDQ)是一种简短的五因素行为工具,旨在评估儿童和青少年的情绪和行为问题。本研究的目的是评估丹麦版 SDQ 在不同年龄组的男孩和女孩的家长和教师评定中的心理测量特性。

方法

丹麦版 SDQ 共分发给四个大型丹麦队列中 5 岁、7 岁和 10 至 12 岁儿童的 71840 名家长和教师评定者。评估了内部可靠性,并进行了探索性因素分析,以复制最初提出的五因素结构。检查了平均分数和百分位数,以便区分情绪和行为困难的低、中、高水平。

结果

可以充分证实原始的五因素结构。然而,“行为”项目并未完全加载到提议的“行为”量表上,并且“行为”量表进一步受到非行为项目的污染。正面描述的项目倾向于加载到“亲社会”量表上。这种情况在教师中比在家长中更为明显。与英国的数据相比,家长和教师的平均值和百分位数较低,但与其他北欧国家的数据相似或仅略低。女孩的百分位数通常低于男孩,教师多动评定的差异尤为明显。

结论

该研究支持 SDQ 作为一般丹麦人群中不同年龄组和评定者的筛查工具的有用性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Preliminary Danish Norms for the Odense Child Trauma Screening (OCTS).丹麦欧登塞儿童创伤筛查(OCTS)初步规范。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Apr 4;17(3):805-829. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00616-7. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

4
Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort.社会经济因素对丹麦全国出生队列的选择。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 May;25(5):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9448-2. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
10
Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?队列研究中的低参与率会导致偏差吗?
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):413-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000220549.14177.60.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验