Suppr超能文献

丹麦欧登塞儿童创伤筛查(OCTS)初步规范。

Preliminary Danish Norms for the Odense Child Trauma Screening (OCTS).

作者信息

Alkærsig Mette, Elklit Ask, Løkkegaard Sille Schandorph

机构信息

The Danish Center of Psychotraumatology, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

The CH:LD Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Apr 4;17(3):805-829. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00616-7. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Odense Child Trauma Screening (OCTS) is Danish story stem screening tool applicable for assessment of preschoolers and young children in risk of being traumatized. Having shown initial evidence of validation, Danish norms are needed to strengthen the clinical assessment with the OCTS by serving as a baseline comparison for assessment of potentially traumatized children. We tested 169 children from the Danish general population aged 4-8 with the OCTS and investigated sex and age differences in play-based behavior and narrative representations. Caregivers reported electronically on child demographic information, psychosocial functioning, and history of trauma exposure using and trauma list. Across the 145 scores of the OCTS coding scheme, significant sex and age differences were only found in five and sixteen scores respectively. In the five codes where significant sex differences were observed, boys' normative scores were higher. No significant sex differences were found in the partial story scores or the OCTS total score. Three significant age differences in partial story and OCTS total scores emerged with 4-year-olds scoring higher than 6-8-year-olds. We further found 13 significant age differences in code scores with higher scores among the youngest of the two groups in question suggesting that scores tend to decrease along older age. Few significant sex and age differences were found in children's OCTS play-based behavior and narrative representations. Indicative of few sex and age biases of the OCTS coding scheme and stories, results suggest that the OCTS can be applied across the intended target group of children aged 4 to 8 years. As higher scores were found in the younger age groups, clinicians should be attentive to age in certain codes of the OCTS coding scheme in their assessment of children in clinical practice. The preliminary normative scores must be interpreted and clinically applied with caution due to our non-representative sample and lack of analyses on factors potentially influencing children's responses to the OCTS (e.g., developmental, contextual, cultural factors).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-024-00616-7.

摘要

未标注

欧登塞儿童创伤筛查(OCTS)是一种丹麦故事主干筛查工具,适用于评估有受创伤风险的学龄前儿童和幼儿。在已显示出初步验证证据的情况下,需要丹麦常模来加强使用OCTS进行的临床评估,作为评估潜在受创伤儿童的基线比较。我们用OCTS对169名4至8岁丹麦普通人群儿童进行了测试,并调查了基于游戏的行为和叙事表现中的性别和年龄差异。照料者通过电子方式报告儿童人口统计学信息、心理社会功能以及使用[具体工具]和创伤清单的创伤暴露史。在OCTS编码方案的145个分数中,分别仅在5个和16个分数中发现了显著的性别和年龄差异。在观察到显著性别差异的5个编码中,男孩的常模分数更高。在部分故事分数或OCTS总分中未发现显著性别差异。在部分故事和OCTS总分中出现了3个显著的年龄差异,4岁儿童得分高于6至8岁儿童。我们还在编码分数中发现了13个显著的年龄差异,在所讨论的两组中最年幼组得分更高,这表明分数往往随着年龄增长而降低。在儿童的OCTS基于游戏的行为和叙事表现中发现的性别和年龄差异很少。结果表明OCTS编码方案和故事几乎没有性别和年龄偏差,这表明OCTS可应用于4至8岁的目标儿童群体。由于较年轻年龄组得分较高,临床医生在临床实践中评估儿童时,应在OCTS编码方案的某些编码中注意年龄因素。由于我们的样本不具有代表性且缺乏对可能影响儿童对OCTS反应的因素(如发育、背景、文化因素)的分析,这些初步常模分数必须谨慎解释和临床应用。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40653-024-00616-7获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf0/11413271/f7d448b50102/40653_2024_616_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验