Suppr超能文献

透明质酸治疗除膝关节以外的所有关节骨关节炎:当前有哪些证据?

Hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis in all joints except the knee: what is the current evidence?

机构信息

University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pellenberg, Belgium.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(2):101-12. doi: 10.2165/11630830-000000000-00000.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) is a well known treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). In other joints, less evidence is available about the efficacy of treatment with intra-articular HA. HA is also used intra-articularly in the metatarsophalangeal-1 joint, the ankle, the hip, the sacroiliac joint, the facet joints, the carpometacarpal-1 joint, the shoulder and the temporo-mandibular joint. In this systematic review we include all prospective studies about the effects of intra-articular HA in the above-mentioned joints. Its use in the knee joint, however, will be discussed in a separate article in this journal.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Clinical Trial Register, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

After performing a solid systematic review using a rigid methodology and trying to pool the outcomes of different studies, we noticed that, compared with baseline, there is statistical evidence for a positive effect of intra-articular HA. However, there is limited evidence HA is superior to placebo and no evidence that intra-articular HA is better than corticosteroids or other conservative therapies.

CONCLUSION

Our recommendation for future research is that one should focus on adequately powered randomized trials comparing HA treatment with other types of intra-articular or conservative treatment. We think it is useless to further perform and publish (large) non-comparative prospective studies about the use of HA in the treatment of problems caused by OA. It is well perceived that HA exerts positive effects in the treatment of OA, but up to now there is no (strong) evidence available that HA is superior to other treatments of OA such as corticosteroids, physiotherapy or other conservative measures.

摘要

背景

关节内注射透明质酸(HA)是治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的一种常用方法。在其他关节中,关于关节内注射 HA 治疗效果的证据较少。HA 也可用于跖趾-1 关节、踝关节、髋关节、骶髂关节、小关节突关节、腕掌-1 关节、肩部和颞下颌关节。在本系统评价中,我们纳入了所有关于上述关节内注射 HA 效果的前瞻性研究。然而,关于膝关节内注射 HA 的效果,将在本刊的另一篇文章中进行讨论。

方法

使用 MEDLINE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Cochrane 临床试验注册库和 EMBASE 等数据库进行系统评价。

结果

通过严格的方法学进行系统评价,并尝试对不同研究的结果进行汇总,我们注意到与基线相比,关节内注射 HA 具有统计学上的积极效果。然而,HA 优于安慰剂的证据有限,也没有证据表明 HA 优于皮质类固醇或其他保守治疗。

结论

我们对未来研究的建议是,应专注于进行足够大的、比较 HA 治疗与其他类型关节内或保守治疗的随机试验。我们认为,进一步开展和发表(大型)非比较性前瞻性研究来探讨 HA 治疗 OA 相关问题的用途是没有意义的。HA 在治疗 OA 方面具有积极作用已得到广泛认可,但到目前为止,尚无(强有力)证据表明 HA 优于皮质类固醇、物理治疗或其他保守措施等 OA 的其他治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验