Haar Rohini J, Naderi Sassan, Acerra John R, Mathias Maxwell, Alagappan Kumar
North Shore University Hospital/Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2012 Mar 2;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-13.
An effective international response to a disaster requires cooperation and coordination with the existing infrastructure. In some cases, however, international relief efforts can compete with the local work force and affect the balance of health-care systems already in place. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of the international humanitarian response to the 12 January 2010 earthquake on Haitian health-care providers (HHP).
Fifty-nine HHPs were surveyed in August of 2010 using a modified World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief questionnaire (WHOQoL-B) that included questions on respondents' workload before the earthquake, immediately after, and presently. The study population consisted of physicians, nurses, and technicians at public hospitals, non-governmental organization (NGO) clinics, and private offices in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Following the earthquake, public hospital and NGO providers reported a significant increase in their workload (15 of 17 and 22 of 26 respondents, respectively). Conversely, 12 of 16 private providers reported a significant decrease in workload (p < 0.0001). Although all groups reported working a similar number of hours prior to the earthquake (average 40 h/week), they reported working significantly different amounts following the earthquake. Public hospital and NGO providers averaged more than 50 h/week, and private providers averaged just over 33 h/week of employment (p < 0.001).Health-care providers working at public hospitals and NGOs, however, had significantly lower scores on the WHOQoL-B when answering questions about their environment (p < 0.001), and in open-ended responses often commented about the lack of potable water and poor access to toilets. Providers from all groups expressed dissatisfaction with the scope and quality of care provided at public hospitals and NGO clinics, as well as disappointment with the reduction in patient volume at private practices.
The emergency medical response to the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti had the unintended consequence of poorly distributing work among HHPs. To create a robust health-care system in the long term while meeting short-term needs, humanitarian responses should seek to better integrate existing systems and involve local providers in the design and implementation of an emergency program.
对灾难做出有效的国际应对需要与现有基础设施进行合作与协调。然而,在某些情况下,国际救援努力可能会与当地劳动力形成竞争,并影响已有的医疗保健系统平衡。本研究旨在评估2010年1月12日海地地震的国际人道主义应对措施对海地医疗保健提供者(HHP)的影响。
2010年8月,采用经过修改的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQoL - B)对59名海地医疗保健提供者进行了调查,该问卷包含有关受访者在地震前、震后即刻以及当前工作量的问题。研究对象包括海地太子港公立医院、非政府组织(NGO)诊所及私人诊所的医生、护士和技术人员。
地震后,公立医院和非政府组织的提供者报告其工作量显著增加(分别为17名受访者中的15名和26名受访者中的22名)。相反,16名私人诊所提供者中有12名报告工作量显著减少(p < 0.0001)。尽管所有组在地震前报告的工作时长相似(平均每周40小时),但他们报告震后的工作时长差异显著。公立医院和非政府组织的提供者平均每周工作超过50小时,而私人诊所提供者平均每周工作略超过33小时(p < 0.001)。然而,在回答有关其工作环境的问题时,在公立医院和非政府组织工作的医疗保健提供者在WHOQoL - B上的得分显著较低(p < 0.001),并且在开放式回答中经常提到饮用水短缺和厕所使用不便。所有组的提供者都对公立医院和非政府组织诊所提供的护理范围和质量表示不满,同时也对私人诊所患者数量减少感到失望。
2010年1月海地地震的紧急医疗应对措施产生了意外后果,即在海地医疗保健提供者之间工作分配不均。为了在满足短期需求的同时长期建立一个强大的医疗保健系统,人道主义应对措施应寻求更好地整合现有系统,并让当地提供者参与紧急计划的设计和实施。