• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺特异性抗原作为避孕套失败的生物标志物:在一项女用避孕套性能随机试验中,三种实验室检测方法与自我报告的避孕套使用问题的比较。

Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance.

机构信息

California Family Health Council, Los Angeles, CA 90010, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.018. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.018
PMID:22386229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4547345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a biomarker for semen exposure, may provide a more objective measure of condom failure than subject self-reports. Methods for measuring PSA vary and their comparability with respect to assessing condom performance has not been adequately evaluated. This study compared results from three different PSA assays of vaginal samples collected by subjects in a randomized clinical trial which compared the performance of female condoms.

STUDY DESIGN

We selected 30 pairs of pre- and post-coital vaginal samples from subjects who reported condom functionality problems or whose original PSA assay was positive. Samples were retested using three different PSA assays [quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA), rocket immune-electrophoresis (RIE) and chromatographic immunoassay (CIA)]. We compared the proportion of condom uses where the post-coital PSA result indicated semen exposure for each of the three assays.

RESULTS

Despite varying levels of sensitivity, the results from all three assays were remarkably consistent. Self-reported condom failures did not correlate well with positive PSA results, suggesting that exclusive reliance on either PSA or user self-report may be inadequate for assessing condom functionality.

CONCLUSION

In combination with user self-report of condom failure, PSA testing provides a reliable, objective marker of condom functionality. Studies based on PSA testing may improve on conventional contraceptive clinical trials by offering a more direct assessment of a condom product's ability to prevent semen exposure.

摘要

背景

前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)是精液暴露的生物标志物,可能比受试者的自我报告提供更客观的避孕套失败衡量标准。测量 PSA 的方法多种多样,其评估避孕套性能的可比性尚未得到充分评估。本研究比较了在一项比较女用避孕套性能的随机临床试验中,受试者收集的阴道样本中三种不同 PSA 检测方法的结果。

研究设计

我们从报告避孕套功能问题或原始 PSA 检测阳性的受试者中选择了 30 对性交前和性交后阴道样本。使用三种不同的 PSA 检测方法[定量酶联免疫吸附测定(EIA)、火箭免疫电泳(RIE)和色谱免疫测定(CIA)]对样本进行了重新检测。我们比较了三种检测方法中每个检测方法的性交后 PSA 结果表明精液暴露的避孕套使用比例。

结果

尽管灵敏度不同,但三种检测方法的结果非常一致。自我报告的避孕套失败与 PSA 阳性结果相关性不佳,表明仅依赖 PSA 或用户自我报告可能不足以评估避孕套的功能。

结论

与避孕套失败的用户自我报告相结合,PSA 检测提供了可靠、客观的避孕套功能标志物。基于 PSA 检测的研究可能通过更直接评估避孕套产品防止精液暴露的能力来改进传统的避孕临床试验。

相似文献

1
Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance.前列腺特异性抗原作为避孕套失败的生物标志物:在一项女用避孕套性能随机试验中,三种实验室检测方法与自我报告的避孕套使用问题的比较。
Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.018. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
2
Comparison of self-reported female condom failure and biomarker-confirmed semen exposure.自我报告的女用避孕套失败与生物标志物确认的精液暴露的比较。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):406-412. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.143. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a quantifiable indicator of condom failure in clinical trials.在临床试验中评估前列腺特异性抗原作为避孕套失败的可量化指标。
Contraception. 1999 Nov;60(5):289-98. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00098-0.
4
Prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid as a biologic marker of condom failure.阴道液中的前列腺特异性抗原作为避孕套破裂的生物学标志物。
Contraception. 1999 Mar;59(3):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00013-x.
5
Objective markers of condom failure.避孕套失效的客观指标。
Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Sep;25(8):427-32. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199809000-00009.
6
Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to measure semen exposure resulting from male condom failures: implications for contraceptive efficacy and the prevention of sexually transmitted disease.使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)来测量男性避孕套破裂导致的精液暴露:对避孕效果和性传播疾病预防的影响。
Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):139-50. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00478-x.
7
Self-reported mechanical problems during condom use and semen exposure. Comparison of two randomized trials in the United States of America and Brazil.使用避孕套期间自我报告的机械问题及精液暴露情况。美国和巴西两项随机试验的比较。
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Aug;34(8):557-62. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000258487.38309.b9.
8
Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse.女用避孕套在性交过程中作为精液屏障的有效性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb 15;157(4):289-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf212.
9
Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial.男用和女用避孕套在阴道性交过程中预防性接触精液的有效性:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2005 Feb;71(2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.008.
10
Good performance of rapid prostate-specific antigen test for detection of semen exposure in women: implications for qualitative research.快速前列腺特异性抗原检测在女性精液暴露检测中的良好性能:对定性研究的启示
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Aug;36(8):501-6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2b4bf.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of self-reported female condom failure and biomarker-confirmed semen exposure.自我报告的女用避孕套失败与生物标志物确认的精液暴露的比较。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):406-412. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.143. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
Prostate-specific antigen concentration in vaginal fluid after exposure to semen.接触精液后阴道液中前列腺特异性抗原的浓度。
Contraception. 2017 Nov;96(5):336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Assessment of the vaginal residence time of biomarkers of semen exposure.精液暴露生物标志物阴道停留时间的评估。
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
A Prospective Cohort Study of Intimate Partner Violence and Unprotected Sex in HIV-Positive Female Sex Workers in Mombasa, Kenya.肯尼亚蒙巴萨HIV阳性女性性工作者中亲密伴侣暴力与无保护性行为的前瞻性队列研究。
AIDS Behav. 2016 Sep;20(9):2054-64. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1399-5.
5
The use of biomarkers of semen exposure in sexual and reproductive health studies.精液暴露生物标志物在性与生殖健康研究中的应用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;23(10):787-91. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5018. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Does tenofovir gel or do other microbicide products affect detection of biomarkers of semen exposure in vitro?替诺福韦凝胶或其他杀微生物剂产品会影响体外精液暴露生物标志物的检测吗?
Contraception. 2014 Aug;90(2):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
Effect of lubricants and a vaginal spermicide gel on the detection of prostate specific antigen, a biomarker of semen exposure, using a quantitative (Abbott ARCHITECT) assay.润滑剂和阴道杀精凝胶对使用定量(雅培 ARCHITECT)检测法检测前列腺特异性抗原(精液暴露的生物标志物)的影响。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
Methodological lessons from clinical trials and the future of microbicide research.从临床试验中吸取的方法学教训与未来的杀微生物剂研究。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013 Mar;10(1):89-102. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0141-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of unprotected sex among female sex workers in Madagascar: comparing semen biomarkers and self-reported data.马达加斯加女性性工作者中非保护性性行为的预测因素:精液生物标志物与自我报告数据的比较。
AIDS Behav. 2010 Dec;14(6):1279-86. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9742-8.
2
Biomarker validation of reports of recent sexual activity: results of a randomized controlled study in Zimbabwe.近期性活动报告的生物标志物验证:津巴布韦一项随机对照研究的结果
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct 1;170(7):918-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp219. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
3
Prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid after exposure to known amounts of semen and after condom use: comparison of self-collected and nurse-collected samples.接触已知量精液后及使用避孕套后阴道液中的前列腺特异性抗原:自我采集样本与护士采集样本的比较
Hum Reprod. 2008 Nov;23(11):2444-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den283. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
4
Biomarkers of semen in the vagina: applications in clinical trials of contraception and prevention of sexually transmitted pathogens including HIV.阴道内精液生物标志物:在避孕及预防性传播病原体(包括艾滋病毒)临床试验中的应用
Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6):407-19. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
5
Efficacy of the male latex condom and of the female polyurethane condom as barriers to semen during intercourse: a randomized clinical trial.男用乳胶避孕套和女用聚氨酯避孕套在性交时作为精液屏障的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Jul 1;166(1):88-96. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm046. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
6
Self-reported mechanical problems during condom use and semen exposure. Comparison of two randomized trials in the United States of America and Brazil.使用避孕套期间自我报告的机械问题及精液暴露情况。美国和巴西两项随机试验的比较。
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Aug;34(8):557-62. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000258487.38309.b9.
7
Validity of self-reported 'safe sex' among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya--PSA analysis.肯尼亚蒙巴萨女性性工作者自我报告的“安全性行为”的有效性——PSA分析
Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Jan;18(1):33-8. doi: 10.1258/095646207779949899.
8
Prostate-specific antigen to ascertain reliability of self-reported coital exposure to semen.使用前列腺特异性抗原确定自我报告的性交时接触精液情况的可靠性。
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Aug;33(8):476-9. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000231960.92850.75.
9
Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial.男用和女用避孕套在阴道性交过程中预防性接触精液的有效性:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2005 Feb;71(2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.008.
10
Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials.男用乳胶避孕套的有效性:在随机临床试验中用作对照的三种流行避孕套品牌的综合结果。
Contraception. 2004 Nov;70(5):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.008.