Visser J J
van Boetzelaerlaan 89, 2581 AD Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2001;14(1):41-9.
In Holland, first tier medical care outside of office hours is provided by regular GP's acting as Locum GP's. On several occasions concerns have been expressed about Locum GP's not visiting the patient when necessary. The number of complaints against Locum GP's submitted to the Medical Boards has been increasing over time and relate in particular to refusals of Locum GP's to visit the patient. In many of these cases the patient died. The paper develops a quantitative estimate of the risk for the patient due to negligence of Locum GP's. The measure of the risk is taken as the number of patients who died unnecessarily due to negligence of Locum GP's as determined by the Medical Boards. The paper estimates that in Holland in the year 2000 about 1500 patients would probably not have died had the Locum GP's working out-of-hours not been negligent by contravening professional standards. In more than half of these cases the Locum GP's did not visit the patient, or did not visit the patient in time, when necessary. This level of patient risk must be regarded as socially unacceptable. One important explanation for these accidents could be that doctors are largely unfamiliar with the professional standards developed by the Medical Boards. Because of the assumptions made and the uncertainty regarding the data used, the actual numbers of these accidents may be higher or lower than estimated here. Although more reliable data will allow the results to be determined more reliably, this is unlikely to change the acceptability of the risk.
在荷兰,非工作时间的一级医疗护理由担任临时全科医生的普通全科医生提供。人们多次表达了对临时全科医生在必要时不看望患者的担忧。提交给医疗委员会的针对临时全科医生的投诉数量一直在增加,尤其涉及临时全科医生拒绝看望患者的情况。在许多此类案例中,患者死亡。本文对临时全科医生的疏忽给患者带来的风险进行了定量评估。风险的衡量标准是医疗委员会认定的因临时全科医生疏忽而不必要死亡的患者数量。本文估计,在2000年的荷兰,如果非工作时间工作的临时全科医生没有违反专业标准而疏忽大意,大约1500名患者可能不会死亡。在超过半数的此类案例中,临时全科医生没有看望患者,或者在必要时没有及时看望患者。这种患者风险水平必须被视为社会不可接受的。这些事故的一个重要解释可能是医生对医疗委员会制定的专业标准大多不熟悉。由于所作的假设以及所用数据的不确定性,这些事故的实际数量可能高于或低于此处估计的数量。尽管更可靠的数据将使结果能更可靠地确定,但这不太可能改变风险的可接受性。