Tress W, Henry W P, Strupp H H, Reister G, Junkert B
Klinische Einrichtungen für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1990;36(3):240-57.
To be able to identify qualitative differences in the results of psychotherapeutic activity and to establish a relationship between those results and the particularities of the treatment process involved, the problems of the patient, the relevant events during therapy, and therapeutic results must be interrelatable both terminologically and theoretically (P-T-O congruence; Strupp et al., 1989). If, therefore, the relevant qualities of the relationships involved in interpersonal transactions during the therapeutic process are to be represented adequately and independently of schools, an appropriate instrument is required for both clinical and research use. This instrument is introduced here in the form of the Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) after Lorna Smith Benjamin by means of the key question: Who acts how toward whom and how does the latter react to this?
为了能够识别心理治疗活动结果中的质性差异，并确定这些结果与所涉及的治疗过程的特殊性、患者的问题、治疗期间的相关事件以及治疗结果之间的关系，这些问题在术语和理论上必须相互关联（P-T-O一致性；斯特鲁普等人，1989年）。因此，如果要充分且独立于学派来呈现治疗过程中人际互动所涉及关系的相关特质，就需要一种适用于临床和研究的合适工具。这里以洛娜·史密斯·本杰明提出的社会行为结构分析（SASB）的形式引入该工具，借助关键问题：谁以何种方式对待谁，后者对此如何反应？
