Sheidow Ashli J, Jayawardhana Jayani, Bradford W David, Henggeler Scott W, Shapiro Steven B
Family Services Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2012;21(1):69-90. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2012.636701.
The 12-month cost effectiveness of juvenile drug court and evidence-based treatments within Court were compared with traditional Family Court for 128 substance abusing/dependent juvenile offenders participating in a four-condition randomized trial. Intervention conditions included Family Court with community services (FC), Drug Court with community services (DC), Drug Court with Multisystemic Therapy (DC/MST), and Drug Court with MST enhanced with a contingency management program (DC/MST/CM). Average cost effectiveness ratios for substance use and criminal behavior outcomes revealed that economic efficiency in achieving outcomes generally improved from FC to DC, with the addition of evidence-based treatments improving efficiency in obtaining substance use outcomes.
在一项针对128名药物滥用/依赖的青少年罪犯的四条件随机试验中,将青少年毒品法庭及法庭内循证治疗的12个月成本效益与传统家庭法庭进行了比较。干预条件包括提供社区服务的家庭法庭(FC)、提供社区服务的毒品法庭(DC)、采用多系统疗法的毒品法庭(DC/MST),以及采用附带应急管理计划强化多系统疗法的毒品法庭(DC/MST/CM)。药物使用和犯罪行为结果的平均成本效益比显示,实现结果的经济效率通常从FC到DC有所提高,增加循证治疗提高了实现药物使用结果的效率。