Suppr超能文献

针对高危青少年干预措施的经济评估系统评价

Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.

作者信息

Edmunds Kim, Ling Rod, Shakeshaft Anthony, Doran Chris, Searles Andrew

机构信息

Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick Campus, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3450-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify and critique full economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people with the purpose of informing the design of future rigorous economic evaluations of such intervention programs.

METHODS

A PRISMA compliant search of the literature between 2000 and April 2018 was conducted to identify full economic evaluations of youth focussed interventions for at risk young people. Duplicates were removed and two researchers independently screened the article titles and abstracts according to PICOS criteria for exclusion and inclusion. The remaining full text articles were assessed for eligibility and a quality assessment of the included articles was conducted using the Drummond checklist.

RESULTS

The database, grey literature and hand searches located 488 studies of interventions for at risk young people. After preliminary screening of titles and abstracts, 104 studies remained for full text examination and 29 empirical studies containing 32 separate economic evaluations were judged eligible for inclusion in the review. These comprised 13 cost-benefit analyses (41%), 17 cost-effectiveness analyses (53%), one cost-utility analysis (3%) and a social return on investment (3%). Three main methodological challenges were identified: 1. attribution of effects; 2. measuring and valuing outcomes; and 3. identifying relevant costs and consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

A cost-benefit analysis would best capture the dynamic nature of a multi-component intervention for high risk young people, incorporating broader intersectoral outcomes and enabling measurement of more domains of risk. Prospective long-term data collection and a strong study design that incorporates a control group contribute to the quality of economic evaluation. Extrapolation of impact into the future is important for this population, in order to account for the time lag in effect of many impacts and benefits arising from youth interventions.

摘要

背景

本系统文献综述的目的是识别和评判针对高危青年的干预措施的全面经济评估,以便为未来对此类干预项目进行严格的经济评估提供设计依据。

方法

按照PRISMA标准对2000年至2018年4月期间的文献进行检索,以识别针对高危青年的以青年为重点的干预措施的全面经济评估。去除重复项后,两名研究人员根据PICOS纳入和排除标准独立筛选文章标题和摘要。对剩余的全文进行合格性评估,并使用德拉蒙德检查表对纳入文章进行质量评估。

结果

通过数据库、灰色文献和手工检索,共找到488项针对高危青年干预措施的研究。在对标题和摘要进行初步筛选后,剩余104项研究进行全文审查,29项实证研究(包含32项独立的经济评估)被判定符合纳入综述的条件。这些研究包括13项成本效益分析(41%)、17项成本效果分析(53%)、1项成本效用分析(3%)和1项社会投资回报率分析(3%)。确定了三个主要方法学挑战:1. 效果归因;2. 结果测量与估值;3. 识别相关成本和后果。

结论

成本效益分析最能体现针对高危青年的多成分干预措施的动态性质,纳入更广泛的跨部门结果,并能测量更多风险领域。前瞻性长期数据收集以及纳入对照组的强大研究设计有助于提高经济评估的质量。对这一人群而言,将影响外推至未来很重要,以便考虑青年干预措施产生的许多影响和益处的时间滞后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e32/6108123/451b19fdcc10/12913_2018_3450_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验