• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索减少青少年犯罪的社区方案。

Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105097.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18105097
PMID:34065813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8150417/
Abstract

BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based intervention designed to build capacity amongst 14-17-year-old high risk young people. The aim of the current study seeks to explore community value and preferences for reducing youth crime and improving community safety using BackTrack in a rural setting in Armidale, New South Wales, Australia. The study design used discrete choice experiments (DCEs), designed in accordance with the 10-item checklist outlined by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The DCE was pilot tested on 43 participants to test feasibility and comprehension. A revised version of the survey was subsequently completed by 282 people over a 12-day period between 30 May 2016 and 10 June 2016, representing a survey response rate of 35%. Ninety per cent of respondents were residents of Armidale, the local rural town where BackTrack was implemented. The DCE generated results that consistently demonstrated a preference for social programs to address youth crime and community safety in the Armidale area. Respondents chose BackTrack over Greater Police Presence 75% of the time with an annual benefit of Australian dollars (AUD) 150 per household, equivalent to a community benefit of AUD 2.04 million. This study estimates a strong community preference for BackTrack relative to more policing (a community willing to pay equivalent to AUD 2.04 million) highlighting the clear value of including community preferences when evaluating community-based programs for high-risk young people.

摘要

BackTrack 是一个多组成部分、基于社区的干预措施,旨在为 14-17 岁的高风险青少年培养能力。本研究旨在探索在澳大利亚新南威尔士州阿米代尔的农村地区使用 BackTrack 减少青少年犯罪和提高社区安全性的社区价值和偏好。该研究设计使用离散选择实验(DCEs),根据国际药物经济学和结果研究学会概述的 10 项清单进行设计。DCE 在 43 名参与者中进行了试点测试,以测试可行性和理解性。随后,在 2016 年 5 月 30 日至 6 月 10 日的 12 天内,282 人完成了经修订的调查,调查回复率为 35%。90%的受访者是阿米代尔的居民,这是实施 BackTrack 的当地农村城镇。DCE 的结果始终表明,人们更倾向于通过社会项目来解决阿米代尔地区的青少年犯罪和社区安全问题。受访者 75%的时间选择 BackTrack 而不是增加警力,每年每户家庭的收益为 150 澳元(AUD),相当于社区收益为 204 万澳元。这项研究估计,社区对 BackTrack 的偏好明显强于更多的警力(社区愿意支付相当于 204 万澳元的费用),这突显了在评估针对高风险青少年的基于社区的项目时纳入社区偏好的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/8150417/37ac03d886a0/ijerph-18-05097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/8150417/37ac03d886a0/ijerph-18-05097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/400a/8150417/37ac03d886a0/ijerph-18-05097-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.探索减少青少年犯罪的社区方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105097.
2
A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting.《BackTrack:一种基于社区的多组分干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区高危年轻人的成本效益分析》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):10273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610273.
3
Does increasing community and liquor licensees' awareness, police activity, and feedback reduce alcohol-related violent crime? A benefit-cost analysis.提高社区和酒类许可证持有者的意识、增加警察活动和反馈能否减少与酒精相关的暴力犯罪?一项收益成本分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 28;10(11):5490-506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115490.
4
Do community characteristics predict alcohol-related crime?社区特征能否预测与酒精相关的犯罪?
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Jul-Aug;46(4):464-70. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr040. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Providing a safer passage: Perceptions about a neighborhood intervention program for disadvantaged youth.提供更安全的通道:对一个为贫困青年服务的社区干预项目的看法。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;49(7):2838-2852. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22650. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Crime, policing and social order: on the expressive nature of public confidence in policing.犯罪、治安与社会秩序:论公众对治安信心的表达性本质。
Br J Sociol. 2009 Sep;60(3):493-521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01253.x.
7
Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.
8
Patients' value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care.澳大利亚药房中哮喘服务对患者的价值:哮喘护理的未来之路。
J Asthma. 2012 Apr;49(3):310-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.658130. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
9
An Evaluation of a Community-Oriented Policing Program in Taiwan.台湾一项社区导向警务计划的评估
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 May;62(7):2016-2044. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17703719. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.一项探索 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态偏好的初步离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):287-98. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0035-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting.《BackTrack:一种基于社区的多组分干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区高危年轻人的成本效益分析》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):10273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610273.
2
Impact and Return on Investment of the Take Kare Safe Space Program-A Harm Reduction Strategy Implemented in Sydney, Australia.《Take Kare 安全空间项目的影响和投资回报——澳大利亚悉尼实施的一项减少伤害策略》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12111. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212111.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.针对高危青少年干预措施的经济评估系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3450-x.
2
Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider.纳入离散选择实验中的退出选项:需考虑的问题。
Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0324-6.
3
Improving the evidence base for services working with youth at-risk of involvement in the criminal justice system: developing a standardised program approach.
改善针对有卷入刑事司法系统风险的青年的服务的证据基础:制定标准化项目方法。
Health Justice. 2018 Apr 16;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0066-5.
4
Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.遵循良好研究实践建议开展离散选择实验研究:一项用于引出患者对糖尿病治疗偏好的应用研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
A review of the economic impact of mental illness.精神疾病的经济影响综述。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):43-48. doi: 10.1071/AH16115.
6
The Feasibility of Embedding Data Collection into the Routine Service Delivery of a Multi-Component Program for High-Risk Young People.将数据收集嵌入针对高危青少年的多组件项目常规服务提供中的可行性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 20;14(2):208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020208.
7
The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.定性研究方法在离散选择实验中的作用
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):298-313. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16683934. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
The quality and effectiveness of interventions that target multiple risk factors among young people: a systematic review.针对年轻人多种风险因素的干预措施的质量和效果:一项系统综述。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Feb;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12573. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Did we get our money's worth? Bridging economic and behavioral measures of program success in adolescent drug prevention.我们的钱花得值吗?弥合青少年药物预防计划成功的经济和行为衡量标准。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Nov 8;10(11):5908-35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115908.
10
Money Matters: Cost Effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Court with and without Evidence-Based Treatments.资金问题:有无循证治疗的青少年毒品法庭的成本效益
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2012;21(1):69-90. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2012.636701.