Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Mar;32(2):126-32. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.126. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
The identification of molds in clinical laboratories is largely on the basis of phenotypic criteria, the classification of which can be subjective. Recently, molecular methods have been introduced for identification of pathogenic molds in clinical settings. Here, we employed comparative sequence analysis to identify molds.
A total of 47 clinical mold isolates were used in this study, including Aspergillus and Trichophyton. All isolates were identified by phenotypic properties, such as growth rate, colony morphology, and reproductive structures. PCR and direct sequencing, targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, the D1/D2 region of the 28S subunit, and the β-tubulin gene, were performed using primers described previously. Comparative sequence analysis by using the GenBank database was performed with the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) algorithm.
For Aspergillus, 56% and 67% of the isolates were identified to the species level by using ITS and β-tubulin analysis, respectively. Only D1/D2 analysis was useful for Trichophyton identification, with 100% of isolates being identified to the species level. Performances of ITS and D1/D2 analyses were comparable for species-level identification of molds other than Aspergillus and Trichophyton. In contrast, the efficacy of β-tubulin analysis was limited to genus identification because of the paucity of database information for this gene.
The molecular methods employed in this study were valuable for mold identification, although the different loci used had variable usefulness, according to mold genus. Thus, a tailored approach is recommended when selecting amplification targets for molecular identification of molds.
临床实验室中对霉菌的鉴定主要基于表型标准,但这种分类方法可能具有主观性。最近,分子方法已被引入临床环境以鉴定致病性霉菌。在这里,我们采用了比较序列分析来鉴定霉菌。
本研究共使用了 47 株临床霉菌分离株,包括曲霉属和毛癣菌属。所有分离株均通过表型特征进行鉴定,例如生长速度、菌落形态和繁殖结构。使用先前描述的引物进行了针对内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域、28S 亚基的 D1/D2 区域和β-微管蛋白基因的 PCR 和直接测序。使用基本局部比对搜索工具(BLAST)算法对 GenBank 数据库进行了比较序列分析。
对于曲霉属,ITS 和β-微管蛋白分析分别将 56%和 67%的分离株鉴定到种水平。只有 D1/D2 分析对毛癣菌的鉴定有用,100%的分离株被鉴定到种水平。对于曲霉属和毛癣菌以外的霉菌,ITS 和 D1/D2 分析在种水平鉴定方面的性能相当。相比之下,由于该基因的数据库信息有限,β-微管蛋白分析的功效仅限于属的鉴定。
本研究中使用的分子方法对霉菌鉴定具有重要价值,尽管根据霉菌属的不同,使用的不同基因座具有不同的有用性。因此,建议在选择霉菌分子鉴定的扩增靶标时采用定制方法。