Yang Mina, Lee Jang Ho, Kim Young Kwon, Ki Chang Seok, Huh Hee Jae, Lee Nam Yong
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2016 Jan;36(1):60-3. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.1.60.
Mucormycosis, a fatal opportunistic infection in immunocompromised hosts, is caused by fungi belonging to the order Mucorales. Early diagnosis based on exact identification and multidisciplinary treatments is critical. However, identification of Mucorales fungi is difficult and often delayed, resulting in poor prognosis. This study aimed to compare the results of phenotypic and molecular identification of 12 Mucorales isolates collected from 4-yr-accumulated data. All isolates were identified on the basis of phenotypic characteristics such as growth rate, colony morphology, and reproductive structures. PCR and direct sequencing were performed to target internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and/or D1/D2 regions. Target DNA sequencing identified five Lichtheimia isolates, two Rhizopus microsporus isolates, two Rhizomucor pusillus isolates, one Cunninghamella bertholletiae isolate, one Mucor fragilis isolate, and one Syncephalastrum racemosum isolate. Five of the 12 (41.7%) isolates were incorrectly identified on the basis of phenotypic identification. DNA sequencing showed that of these five isolates, two were Lichtheimia isolates, one was Mucor isolate, one was Rhizomucor isolate, and one was Rhizopus microspores. All the isolates were identified at the species level by ITS and/or D1/D2 analyses. Phenotypic differentiation and identification of Mucorales is difficult because different Mucorales share similar morphology. Our results indicate that the molecular methods employed in this study are valuable for identifying Mucorales.
毛霉病是免疫功能低下宿主中一种致命的机会性感染,由毛霉目真菌引起。基于准确鉴定和多学科治疗的早期诊断至关重要。然而,毛霉目真菌的鉴定困难且常常延迟,导致预后不良。本研究旨在比较从4年积累数据中收集的12株毛霉目分离株的表型和分子鉴定结果。所有分离株均根据生长速率、菌落形态和繁殖结构等表型特征进行鉴定。对内部转录间隔区(ITS)和/或D1/D2区域进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)和直接测序。目标DNA测序鉴定出5株 Lichtheimia 分离株、2株微小根霉分离株、2株米根霉分离株、1株柏氏小克银汉霉分离株、1株脆弱毛霉分离株和1株总状共头霉分离株。12株分离株中有5株(41.7%)基于表型鉴定被错误鉴定。DNA测序显示,这5株分离株中,2株为 Lichtheimia 分离株,1株为毛霉分离株,1株为米根霉分离株,1株为微小根霉。所有分离株均通过ITS和/或D1/D2分析鉴定到种水平。毛霉目的表型分化和鉴定困难,因为不同的毛霉目具有相似的形态。我们的结果表明,本研究中采用的分子方法对毛霉目的鉴定具有重要价值。