• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰结直肠癌筛查方案的再评估。

Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England.

机构信息

University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):e547-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03014.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03014.x
PMID:22390210
Abstract

AIM

The aim was to use newly available data to estimate the cost effectiveness and endoscopy requirements of screening options for colorectal cancer (CRC) to inform screening policy in England.

METHODS

A state transition model simulated the life experience of a cohort of individuals in the general population of England with normal colon/rectal epithelium through to the development of adenomas and CRC and subsequent death. CRC natural history model parameters and screening test characteristics were estimated simultaneously by a process of model calibration. This process was fitted to observed data on CRC incidence in the absence of screening, data from existing screening programmes, and data from the UK flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening trial. The costs, effects and resource impact were evaluated for a range of screening options involving the guaiac or immunochemical faecal occult blood test (gFOBT/iFOBT) and FS.

RESULTS

The model suggests that screening strategies involving FS or iFOBT may produce additional benefits compared with the current policy of biennial gFOBT for 60-74-year-olds. The age at which a single FS screen results in the greatest quality-adjusted life year gain was 55, with similar gains for ages between 52 and 58. Strategies which combined FS and iFOBT showed further benefits and improved economic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies which combine different screening modalities may provide greater clinical and economic benefits. The collection of comprehensive screening data using a uniform format will enable comparative analysis across screening programmes in different countries, will improve our understanding of the disease and will allow identification of optimal screening modalities.

摘要

目的

利用新获得的数据,评估结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方案的成本效益和内镜检查需求,为英国的筛查政策提供信息。

方法

采用状态转移模型,模拟英格兰普通人群中正常结肠/直肠上皮个体的一生经历,直至发展为腺瘤和 CRC 并最终死亡。CRC 自然史模型参数和筛查试验特征通过模型校准过程同时进行估计。该过程适用于无筛查情况下 CRC 发病率的观察数据、现有筛查计划的数据以及英国软性乙状结肠镜(FS)筛查试验的数据。对一系列筛查方案(包括愈创木脂或免疫化学粪便潜血试验(gFOBT/iFOBT)和 FS)的成本、效果和资源影响进行了评估。

结果

模型表明,与目前针对 60-74 岁人群进行每两年一次 gFOBT 的政策相比,FS 或 iFOBT 筛查策略可能会带来额外的益处。单次 FS 筛查带来最大质量调整生命年获益的年龄为 55 岁,52-58 岁之间的年龄获益相似。联合使用 FS 和 iFOBT 的策略显示出进一步的益处和更好的经济结果。

结论

结合不同筛查方式的策略可能会带来更大的临床和经济效益。采用统一格式收集全面的筛查数据将能够在不同国家的筛查计划之间进行比较分析,增进我们对该疾病的认识,并确定最佳的筛查方式。

相似文献

1
Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England.英格兰结直肠癌筛查方案的再评估。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):e547-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03014.x.
2
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
3
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
5
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.基于乙状结肠镜检查和免疫化学粪便隐血试验的结直肠癌筛查计划的成本效益。
J Med Screen. 2019 Jun;26(2):76-83. doi: 10.1177/0969141318789710. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial).基于粪便潜血试验的免疫法检测联合乙状结肠镜筛查结直肠癌:一项法国基于人群的对照研究(温特森海姆试验)
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Dec;45(18):3282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
7
Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查项目中,与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验相比,不同阳性阈值下粪便免疫化学检测的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e017186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017186.
8
Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的成本效益:愈创木脂粪便隐血试验、粪便免疫化学试验和乙状结肠镜检查的比较。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):805-16. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.580. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (KCIS 16).基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中免疫化学粪便潜血试验最佳临界值确定的成本效益分析(KCIS 16)
J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):191-9. doi: 10.1258/096914107782912022.
10
Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结直肠癌筛查:愈创木脂粪便潜血试验、粪便免疫化学试验和乙状结肠镜检查的检测负担感知比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jul;46(11):2059-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.022. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review on Calibration Methods for Cancer Simulation Models.癌症模拟模型校准方法的范围综述
Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug 11:272989X251353211. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251353211.
2
Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait.科威特三种结直肠癌筛查方式的成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91119-4.
3
Quantifying the cost savings and health impacts of improving colonoscopy quality: an economic evaluation.量化提高结肠镜检查质量所带来的成本节约和健康影响:一项经济评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jun 19;34(7):469-478. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016932.
4
Explorative cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer recurrence detection with next-generation sequencing liquid biopsy in Spain, France, and Germany.西班牙、法国和德国采用下一代测序液体活检检测结直肠癌复发的探索性成本效益分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 May 10;17:17562848241248246. doi: 10.1177/17562848241248246. eCollection 2024.
5
Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models.直肠乙状结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查中的地位如何?成本效益模型的系统评价和批判性评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 18;18(8):e0290353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290353. eCollection 2023.
6
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities?欧洲结直肠癌筛查成本效益分析的系统评价:研究是否纳入了最佳筛查强度?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Sep;21(5):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
7
Two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling: an economic evaluation.两种 HPV 初筛宫颈癌的自我采样方法与临床医生采样的比较:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 6;13(6):e068940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068940.
8
Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.腺瘤切除术后结肠镜随访以降低结直肠癌风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(26):1-156. doi: 10.3310/OLUE3796.
9
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
10
Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review.经济评估在一般风险人群中对结直肠癌的早期检测的筛查策略:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227251. eCollection 2019.