Klingstedt C, Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S, Lundqvist H, Strandberg A, Tokics L, Brismar B
Department of Anesthesiology, Södersjukhuset, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990 Aug;34(6):421-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03117.x.
Patients without respiratory symptoms were studied awake and during general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation prior to elective surgery. Ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) relationships, gas exchange and atelectasis formation were studied during five different conditions: 1) supine, awake; 2) supine during anesthesia with conventional mechanical ventilation (CV); 3) in the left lateral position during CV; 4) as 3) but with 10 cm of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and 5) as 3) but using differential ventilation with selective PEEP (DV + SPEEP) to the dependent lung. Atelectatic areas and increases of shunt blood flow and blood flow to regions with low VA/Q ratios appeared after induction of anesthesia and CV. With the patients in the lateral position, further VA/Q mismatch with a fall in PaO2 and increased dead space ventilation was observed. Atelectatic lung areas were still present, although the total atelectatic area was slightly decreased. Some of the effects caused by the lateral position could be counteracted by adding PEEP. Perfusion of regions with low VA/Q ratios and venous admixture were then diminished, while PaO2 was slightly increased; shunt blood flow and dead space ventilation were essentially unchanged. During CV + PEEP, there was a decrease in cardiac output, compared to CV in the lateral position. DV + SPEEP was more effective than CV + PEEP in decreasing shunt flow and increasing PaO2 in the lateral position; in addition to this, cardiac output was not affected.
在择期手术前,对无呼吸道症状的患者在清醒状态以及全身麻醉机械通气期间进行了研究。在五种不同情况下研究了通气-灌注(VA/Q)关系、气体交换和肺不张形成情况:1)仰卧位,清醒;2)麻醉期间仰卧位,采用传统机械通气(CV);3)CV期间左侧卧位;4)同3)但施加10 cm呼气末正压(PEEP);5)同3)但对下垂肺采用选择性PEEP的差异通气(DV + SPEEP)。麻醉诱导和CV后出现肺不张区域以及分流血流量增加和血流向VA/Q比值低的区域。患者处于侧卧位时,观察到进一步的VA/Q不匹配,伴有动脉血氧分压(PaO2)下降和无效腔通气增加。肺不张区域仍然存在,尽管总的肺不张面积略有减小。侧卧位引起的一些影响可通过添加PEEP来抵消。然后,VA/Q比值低的区域的灌注和静脉混合减少,而PaO2略有增加;分流血流量和无效腔通气基本不变。与侧卧位的CV相比,CV + PEEP期间心输出量下降。在侧卧位时,DV + SPEEP在减少分流流量和增加PaO2方面比CV + PEEP更有效;除此之外,心输出量不受影响。