Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 90095-7115, USA,
Interdiscip Sci. 2012 Mar;4(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s12539-012-0117-x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Spatial colocalization of fluorescently labeled proteins can reveal valuable information about proteinprotein interactions. Compared to qualitative visual interpretation of dual color images, quantitative colocalization analysis (QCA) provides more objective evaluations to the degree of colocalization. However, the finite resolution power of microscopes and the spatial patterns of intracellular structures may compromise the reliability of many classical QCA methods. In this paper, we discuss the strength and weakness of some mostly used QCA methods. By studying their applications on computer-simulated images and biological images, we show that classical pixel intensity based QCA methods are often vulnerable to coincidental overlapping among resolution elements (resel) distributions and thus not suitable to images with high molecular density or with low resolution. Also, many QCA methods can mistakenly regard long range correlation as colocalization due to protein localization in intracellular structures. The newly developed protein-protein index (PPI) approach is able to reduce the influence from resel overlapping and spatial intracellular pattern compared to previous methods, significantly improving the reliability of QCA.
荧光标记蛋白的空间共定位可以揭示蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的有价值信息。与双荧光图像的定性视觉解释相比,定量共定位分析(QCA)为共定位程度提供了更客观的评估。然而,显微镜的有限分辨率能力和细胞内结构的空间模式可能会影响许多经典 QCA 方法的可靠性。在本文中,我们讨论了一些最常用的 QCA 方法的优缺点。通过研究它们在计算机模拟图像和生物图像上的应用,我们表明基于经典像素强度的 QCA 方法通常容易受到分辨率元素(resel)分布偶然重叠的影响,因此不适合分子密度高或分辨率低的图像。此外,由于蛋白质在细胞内结构中的定位,许多 QCA 方法可能会错误地将长程相关性视为共定位。与以前的方法相比,新开发的蛋白质-蛋白质指数(PPI)方法能够减少 resel 重叠和细胞内空间模式的影响,显著提高 QCA 的可靠性。