• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态对比增强 MRI 灌注参数与乳腺癌预后因素及亚型的相关性。

Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):145-51. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23635. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.23635
PMID:22392859
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a correlation exists between perfusion parameters obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prognostic factors or immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quantitative parameters (K(trans) , k(ep) , and v(e) ) of 70 invasive ductal carcinomas were obtained using DCE-MRI as a postprocessing procedure. Correlations between parameters and prognostic factors, including tumor size, axillary nodal status, histologic grade, nuclear grade, expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, p53, bcl-2, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and subtypes categorized as luminal (ER or PR-positive), triple negative (ER or PR-negative, HER2-negative), and HER2 (ER and PR-negative, HER2 overexpression) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean K(trans) was higher in tumors with a high histologic grade than with a low histologic grade (P = 0.007), with a high nuclear grade than with a low nuclear grade (P = 0.002), and with ER negativity than ER positivity (P = 0.056). Mean k(ep) was higher in tumors with a high histologic grade than with a low histologic grade (P = 0.005), with a high nuclear grade than with a low nuclear grade (P = 0.001), and with ER negativity than with ER positivity (P = 0.043). Mean v(e) was lower in tumors with a high histologic grade than with a low histologic grade (P = 0.038) and with ER negativity than with ER positivity (P = 0.015). Triple-negative cancers showed a higher mean k(ep) than the luminal type (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancers with higher K(trans) and k(ep) , or lower v(e) , had poor prognostic factors and were often of the triple-negative subtype.

摘要

目的

研究动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)获得的灌注参数与乳腺癌的预后因素和免疫组织化学亚型之间是否存在相关性。

材料与方法

对 70 例浸润性导管癌进行 DCE-MRI 后处理,获取定量参数(K(trans)、k(ep)、v(e))。分析参数与肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结状态、组织学分级、核分级、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、Ki-67、p53、bcl-2、人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)表达及分为 luminal(ER 或 PR 阳性)、三阴性(ER 或 PR 阴性、HER2 阴性)和 HER2(ER 和 PR 阴性、HER2 过表达)亚型之间的相关性。

结果

组织学分级高的肿瘤 K(trans)均值高于组织学分级低的肿瘤(P=0.007),核分级高的肿瘤 K(trans)均值高于核分级低的肿瘤(P=0.002),ER 阴性的肿瘤 K(trans)均值高于 ER 阳性的肿瘤(P=0.056)。组织学分级高的肿瘤 k(ep)均值高于组织学分级低的肿瘤(P=0.005),核分级高的肿瘤 k(ep)均值高于核分级低的肿瘤(P=0.001),ER 阴性的肿瘤 k(ep)均值高于 ER 阳性的肿瘤(P=0.043)。组织学分级高的肿瘤 v(e)均值低于组织学分级低的肿瘤(P=0.038),ER 阴性的肿瘤 v(e)均值低于 ER 阳性的肿瘤(P=0.015)。三阴性乳腺癌的 k(ep)均值高于 luminal 型(P=0.015)。

结论

K(trans)和 k(ep)较高、v(e)较低的乳腺癌具有不良预后因素,且常为三阴性亚型。

相似文献

1
Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.动态对比增强 MRI 灌注参数与乳腺癌预后因素及亚型的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):145-51. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23635. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?“非肿块型”与“肿块型”浸润性导管乳腺癌的预后因素是否存在差异?
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
3
Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.使用定量氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖/正电子发射断层扫描成像参数比较三阴性乳腺癌与雌激素受体阳性/孕激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌:一种对疾病特征描述可能有用的方法。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 1;112(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23226.
4
Deconvolution-based dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast tumors: correlation of tumor blood flow with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and clinicopathologic findings--preliminary results.基于去卷积的乳腺肿瘤动态对比增强磁共振成像:肿瘤血流与人表皮生长因子受体2状态及临床病理结果的相关性——初步结果
Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):471-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492071147. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
5
Enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: do they correlate with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers?动态对比增强乳腺MRI的增强参数:它们与乳腺癌的预后因素及亚型相关吗?
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;33(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.034. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
6
Analysis of kinetic curve and model-based perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients: Correlations with dominant stroma type.乳腺癌患者动态对比增强磁共振成像的动力学曲线及基于模型的灌注参数分析:与主要间质类型的相关性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jan;34(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
7
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.3.0T下表观扩散系数的直方图分析:与浸润性导管癌预后因素及亚型的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1666-78. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24934. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
8
Quantitative MRI morphology of invasive breast cancer: correlation with immunohistochemical biomarkers and subtypes.浸润性乳腺癌的定量MRI形态学:与免疫组化生物标志物及亚型的相关性
Acta Radiol. 2015 Mar;56(3):269-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185114524197. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
9
Pathologic features and molecular phenotype by patient age in a large cohort of young women with breast cancer.在一个大型的年轻女性乳腺癌患者队列中,根据患者年龄的不同,其病理特征和分子表型也不同。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;131(3):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1872-9. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
10
Enhancement patterns and parameters of breast cancers at contrast-enhanced US: correlation with prognostic factors.增强型超声下乳腺癌的增强模式和参数:与预后因素的相关性。
Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):450-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110789.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized Breast Cancer Prognosis Using a Model Based on MRI and Clinicopathological Variables.使用基于MRI和临床病理变量的模型进行个性化乳腺癌预后评估
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01500-y.
2
Hyperoxic BOLD-MRI-Based Characterization of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Is Independent of the Supplied Amount of Oxygen: A Preclinical Study.基于高氧血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像对乳腺癌分子亚型的特征描述与氧气供应量无关:一项临床前研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;13(18):2946. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182946.
3
Golden-angle radial sparse parallel magnetic resonance imaging of rectal perfusion: utility in the diagnosis of poorly differentiated rectal cancer.
直肠灌注的金角径向稀疏并行磁共振成像:在低分化直肠癌诊断中的应用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):4826-4838. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1244. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Comparison of CT- and MRI-Based Quantification of Tumor Heterogeneity and Vascularity for Correlations with Prognostic Biomarkers and Survival Outcomes: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.基于CT和MRI的肿瘤异质性和血管生成定量分析与预后生物标志物及生存结果的相关性比较:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;10(5):504. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050504.
5
Use of biexponential and stretched exponential models of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess the proliferation of endometrial carcinoma.使用体素内不相干运动的双指数和拉伸指数模型以及动态对比增强磁共振成像评估子宫内膜癌的增殖情况。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):2568-2581. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-688. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict lymphovascular invasion and survival outcome in breast cancer.动态对比增强磁共振成像定量参数预测乳腺癌淋巴管血管侵犯及生存预后。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Oct 22;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00499-7.
7
Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging quantitative parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological breast cancer.磁共振成像定量参数及表观扩散系数值与乳腺癌病理的相关性
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 26;10(21):7333-7340. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7333.
8
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.乳腺癌亚型与定量磁共振成像:一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):490. doi: 10.3390/life12040490.
9
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MR Spectroscopic Methods in Understanding Breast Cancer Biology and Metabolism.磁共振成像(MRI)及磁共振波谱方法在理解乳腺癌生物学与代谢方面的应用
Metabolites. 2022 Mar 27;12(4):295. doi: 10.3390/metabo12040295.
10
Relationship between histogram metrics of pharmacokinetic parameters of DCE-MRI and histological phenotype in breast cancer.动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)药代动力学参数的直方图指标与乳腺癌组织学表型之间的关系
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jan;9(1):30-41. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.11.10.