Suppr超能文献

将衰弱和残疾因素纳入心脏手术风险评分,可识别出死亡或发生重大并发症风险较高的老年患者。

Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity.

作者信息

Afilalo Jonathan, Mottillo Salvatore, Eisenberg Mark J, Alexander Karen P, Noiseux Nicolas, Perrault Louis P, Morin Jean-Francois, Langlois Yves, Ohayon Samuel M, Monette Johanne, Boivin Jean-Francois, Shahian David M, Bergman Howard

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, SMBD–Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):222-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963157. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

Abstract

Background- Cardiac surgery risk scores perform poorly in elderly patients, in part because they do not take into account frailty and disability which are critical determinants of health status with advanced age. There is an unmet need to combine established cardiac surgery risk scores with measures of frailty and disability to provide a more complete model for risk prediction in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods and Results- This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of elderly patients (≥70 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery in the United States and Canada. Four different frailty scales, 3 disability scales, and 5 cardiac surgery risk scores were measured in all patients. The primary outcome was the STS composite end point of in-hospital postoperative mortality or major morbidity. A total of 152 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 75.9±4.4 years and 34% women. Depending on the scale used, 20-46% of patients were found to be frail, and 5-76% were found to have at least 1 disability. The most predictive scale in each domain was: 5-meter gait speed ≥6 seconds as a measure of frailty (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-5.90), ≥3 impairments in the Nagi scale as a measure of disability (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.35-6.56) and either the Parsonnet score (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality or Major Morbidity (STS-PROMM) (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09) as a cardiac surgery risk score. Compared with the Parsonnet score or STS-PROMM alone, (area under the curve, 0.68-0.72), addition of frailty and disability provided incremental value and improved model discrimination (area under the curve, 0.73-0.76). Conclusions- Clinicians should use an integrative approach combining frailty, disability, and risk scores to better characterize elderly patients referred for cardiac surgery and identify those that are at increased risk.

摘要

背景——心脏手术风险评分在老年患者中表现不佳,部分原因是它们没有考虑到衰弱和残疾,而这两者是老年健康状况的关键决定因素。将既定的心脏手术风险评分与衰弱和残疾指标相结合,以提供一个更完整的模型来预测接受心脏手术的老年患者的风险,这一需求尚未得到满足。方法和结果——这是一项针对美国和加拿大接受冠状动脉搭桥和/或瓣膜手术的老年患者(≥70岁)的前瞻性多中心队列研究。对所有患者测量了四种不同的衰弱量表、三种残疾量表和五种心脏手术风险评分。主要结局是胸外科医师协会(STS)术后住院死亡率或主要并发症的综合终点。共纳入152例患者,平均年龄75.9±4.4岁,女性占34%。根据所使用的量表,发现20%至46%的患者存在衰弱,5%至76%的患者至少有一种残疾。每个领域中预测性最强的量表分别为:5米步行速度≥6秒作为衰弱指标(比值比[OR],2.63;95%置信区间[CI],1.17 - 5.90),纳吉量表中≥3项功能障碍作为残疾指标(OR,2.98;95%CI,1.35 - 6.56),以及帕森内特评分(OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04 - 1.13)或胸外科医师协会预测的死亡或主要并发症风险(STS - PROMM)(OR,1.05;95%CI,1.01 - 1.09)作为心脏手术风险评分。与单独使用帕森内特评分或STS - PROMM相比(曲线下面积,0.68 - 0.72),加入衰弱和残疾指标可提供额外价值并改善模型判别能力(曲线下面积,0.73 - 0.76)。结论——临床医生应采用综合方法,将衰弱、残疾和风险评分相结合,以更好地描述转诊接受心脏手术的老年患者特征,并识别出风险增加者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验