Sündermann Simon H, Dademasch Anika, Seifert Burkhardt, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer Héctor, Emmert Maximilian Y, Walther Thomas, Jacobs Stephan, Mohr Friedrich-Wilhelm, Falk Volkmar, Starck Christoph Thomas
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):580-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu006. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Assessment of perioperative risk of elderly patients in cardiac surgery is difficult, and most of the common risk scores show over- or underestimation. Two frailty scores, the comprehensive assessment of frailty (CAF) score and the Frailty predicts death One yeaR after CArdiac Surgery Test (FORECAST), were developed as additional tools to estimate the preoperative mortality risk, taking into consideration the frailty status of elderly patients.
Four hundred and fifty patients who were referred for elective cardiac surgery were included. All the patients were assessed with the CAF test and the FORECAST. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were evaluated by telephone interview. Univariate and bivariate logistic regression were performed to test the predictive power of the tests on mortality. Correlation of the scores with age was calculated with Spearman ranks. Three commensurate groups were built for each of the frailty scores and the outcome was compared between the groups. All analyses were performed for Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) accordingly.
A total of 227 male and 223 female patients were included. Thirty-day mortality was 6.1%, and 1-year mortality was 13.3%. Logistic regression showed that both scores are able to predict 30-day as well as 1-year mortality. Bivariate logistic regression showed that both frailty scores give relevant additional information to the STS and EuroSCORE for the prediction of 1-year mortality. The frailty scores were only weakly correlated with age in contrast to STS and EuroSCORE and therefore can be used as indicator of the biological age of patients besides the numerical age. Survival up to 1 year was relevantly reduced in the group of patients with the higher frailty scores.
CAF and FORECAST are additional tools to evaluate elderly patients adequately before elective cardiac surgery, and showed an association with short- and mid-term mortality independently of age.
评估老年患者心脏手术围手术期风险具有挑战性,多数常用风险评分存在高估或低估情况。考虑到老年患者的衰弱状态,开发了两种衰弱评分,即衰弱综合评估(CAF)评分和心脏手术后一年死亡衰弱预测测试(FORECAST),作为估计术前死亡风险的补充工具。
纳入450例接受择期心脏手术的患者。所有患者均接受CAF测试和FORECAST评估。通过电话访谈评估30天和1年死亡率。进行单因素和双因素逻辑回归以检验测试对死亡率的预测能力。使用Spearman秩相关分析评分与年龄的相关性。为每个衰弱评分构建三个相应组,并比较组间结果。所有分析均分别针对胸外科医师协会(STS)和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)进行。
共纳入227例男性和223例女性患者。30天死亡率为6.1%,1年死亡率为13.3%。逻辑回归显示,两种评分均能够预测30天和1年死亡率。双因素逻辑回归显示,两种衰弱评分可为STS和EuroSCORE预测1年死亡率提供相关的额外信息。与STS和EuroSCORE不同,衰弱评分与年龄仅呈弱相关,因此除实际年龄外,还可作为患者生物学年龄的指标。衰弱评分较高的患者组1年生存率明显降低。
CAF和FORECAST是在择期心脏手术前充分评估老年患者的补充工具,且与短期和中期死亡率相关,独立于年龄因素。