Sumrani N, Delaney V, Ding Z K, Butt K, Hong J
Department of Surgery and Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1990 Nov;16(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80053-9.
Seventy-two and 34 consecutive HLA-identical sibling renal transplant recipients were treated with azathioprine/prednisone (AZA; follow-up, 5.0 years) and cyclosporine/prednisone (CSA; mean follow-up, 2.9 years), respectively. Both groups were similar in age, sex, race, and number of transplants, but there were more diabetics in the CSA group (34% v 8%). Actual patient survival at 1 year and actuarial patient survival at 5 years were 100% and 96%, respectively in the CSA group compared with an actual patient survival of 91% and 82% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, in the AZA group. Actual graft survival at 1 year improved from 85% in the AZA group to 97% in the CSA-treated recipients (P less than 0.05). Mean serum creatinine at 5 years remained stable in the AZA group at a mean of 123 mumol/L (1.4 mg/dL) compared with a progressive increase in this parameter to a mean of 212 mumol/L (2.4 mg/dL) after the same time interval in the CSA patients. Furthermore, the slopes of the serum creatinine against time were significantly different between the two groups (P less than 0.01). Mean daily CSA dose averaged 4 mg/kg 12 months following transplantation, with a decrease to 2.4 mg/kg by the fifth year. Causes of death in the AZA group were cardiovascular (eight), sepsis (three), cancer (one); and in the CSA group, Kaposi's sarcoma (one). Causes of graft failure in the AZA group were immunological (six), sepsis (three), technical (two), recurrence of disease (one), and patient death with a functioning graft (five). Technical (one), noncompliance (two), recurrence of disease (one), and patient death with a functioning kidney (one) caused graft failure in the CSA group. No difference in posttransplantation serum cholesterol or incidence of new onset diabetes was observed between the two groups, but hypertension was significantly more frequent (51% v 21%, P less than 0.01) when CSA was used. In conclusion, intermediate-term results of CSA-treated HLA-identical transplant recipients showed improved patient and graft survival with less complications apart from hypertension. However, the slow, but relentless, increase in serum creatinine in the CSA-treated patients compared with those treated with AZA is of concern.
72例和34例连续接受HLA相同的同胞肾移植受者分别接受硫唑嘌呤/泼尼松(AZA组;随访5.0年)和环孢素/泼尼松(CSA组;平均随访2.9年)治疗。两组在年龄、性别、种族和移植次数方面相似,但CSA组糖尿病患者更多(34%对8%)。CSA组1年实际患者生存率和5年精算患者生存率分别为100%和96%,而AZA组1年和5年实际患者生存率分别为91%和82%。AZA组1年实际移植物生存率从85%提高到CSA治疗受者的97%(P<0.05)。AZA组5年时平均血清肌酐保持稳定,平均为123μmol/L(1.4mg/dL),而CSA组在相同时间间隔后该参数逐渐升高至平均212μmol/L(2.4mg/dL)。此外,两组血清肌酐随时间变化的斜率有显著差异(P<0.01)。移植后12个月CSA平均每日剂量为4mg/kg,到第5年降至2.4mg/kg。AZA组的死亡原因是心血管疾病(8例)、败血症(3例)、癌症(1例);CSA组为卡波西肉瘤(1例)。AZA组移植物失败的原因是免疫因素(6例)、败血症(3例)、技术问题(2例)、疾病复发(1例)以及移植物功能正常时患者死亡(5例)。CSA组移植物失败的原因是技术问题(1例)、不依从(2例)、疾病复发(1例)以及有功能肾时患者死亡(1例)。两组移植后血清胆固醇或新发糖尿病发生率无差异,但使用CSA时高血压明显更常见(51%对21%,P<0.01)。总之,CSA治疗的HLA相同移植受者的中期结果显示患者和移植物生存率提高,除高血压外并发症较少。然而,与AZA治疗的患者相比,CSA治疗患者血清肌酐缓慢但持续升高令人担忧。