• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)致视力损害的成本效果:RESTORE 试验证据。

Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: evidence from the RESTORE trial.

机构信息

Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, 2145 Australia.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;96(5):688-93. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300726. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300726
PMID:22399690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3329632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab as either monotherapy or combined with laser therapy, compared with laser monotherapy, in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment from a UK healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model simulated long-term outcomes and costs of treating DME in one eye (BCVA ≤75 letters) based on data from the RESTORE Phase III trial. Outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were simulated for a 15-year time horizon based on 12-month follow-up from RESTORE and published long-term data. Costs included treatment, disease monitoring, visual impairment and blindness (at 2010 price levels).

RESULTS

Ranibizumab monotherapy resulted in a 0.17 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4191 relative to laser monotherapy, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £24 028. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 64% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Combined ranibizumab and laser therapy resulted in a 0.13 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4695 relative to laser monotherapy (ICER £36 106; 42% probability of ICER <£30 000).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on RESTORE 1-year follow-up data, ranibizumab monotherapy appears to be cost-effective relative to laser monotherapy, the current standard of care. Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy is less certain. Ongoing studies will further inform on disease progression and the need for additional ranibizumab treatment.

摘要

背景/目的:从英国医疗保健支付者的角度评估雷珠单抗单药治疗或联合激光治疗与激光单药治疗相比,治疗视力受损的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的成本效益。

方法

根据 RESTORE III 期试验的数据,采用 Markov 模型模拟长期结局和成本,以治疗一眼 DME(BCVA≤75 个字母)。根据 RESTORE 12 个月随访和已发表的长期数据,以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量 15 年时间内的结果。成本包括治疗、疾病监测、视力障碍和失明(按 2010 年价格水平计算)。

结果

雷珠单抗单药治疗相对于激光单药治疗,增加了 0.17 个 QALY,增量成本为 4191 英镑,增量成本效益比(ICER)为 24028 英镑。概率敏感性分析显示,在 30000 英镑/QALY 的阈值下,有 64%的可能性具有成本效益。与激光单药治疗相比,联合雷珠单抗和激光治疗增加了 0.13 个 QALY,增量成本为 4695 英镑(ICER 为 36106 英镑;42%的可能性低于 30000 英镑/QALY)。

结论

基于 RESTORE 1 年随访数据,雷珠单抗单药治疗相对于当前的标准治疗激光单药治疗似乎具有成本效益。联合治疗的成本效益不太确定。正在进行的研究将进一步提供关于疾病进展和额外雷珠单抗治疗需求的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ce37e897d857/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ddefae9fd387/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ce37e897d857/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ddefae9fd387/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ce37e897d857/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: evidence from the RESTORE trial.雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)致视力损害的成本效果:RESTORE 试验证据。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;96(5):688-93. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300726. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in the treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema.雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿致视力损害的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):663-71. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1154566. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema.雷珠单抗联合即刻或延迟激光与曲安奈德联合即刻激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的成本效果分析。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.049. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效果分析。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1416-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Cost-effectiveness of various interventions for newly diagnosed diabetic macular edema.各种新诊断的糖尿病性黄斑水肿干预措施的成本效益。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 May 1.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Comparative Effectiveness Trial.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效益:来自糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络比较疗效试验的分析
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.
7
Cost-effectiveness of treatment of diabetic macular edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗的成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 7;160(1):18-29. doi: 10.7326/M13-0768.
8
Five-Year Cost-effectiveness of Intravitreous Ranibizumab Therapy vs Panretinal Photocoagulation for Treating Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体内雷珠单抗治疗与全视网膜光凝治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变的 5 年成本效益比较:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1424-1432. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4284.
9
A United Kingdom-based economic evaluation of ranibizumab for patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).一项基于英国的雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者的经济学评估。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jun;17(6):423-34. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.909435. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
10
The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema.RESTORE 研究:雷珠单抗单药治疗或联合激光治疗与单纯激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):615-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.031.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of intraocular pressure elevation associated with triamcinolone acetonide administration via different routes in macular edema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同途径给予曲安奈德治疗黄斑水肿时眼压升高的风险:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03979-z.
2
The Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide Versus Lower-Cost Liraglutide in the UK.口服司美格鲁肽与低成本利拉鲁肽在英国的长期成本效益
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Apr;16(4):613-628. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01691-1. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of diabetic macular oedema and related health and social care resource use in England.英格兰糖尿病性黄斑水肿的流行情况以及相关的卫生和社会保健资源利用情况。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):345-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2011.204040. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema.RESTORE 研究:雷珠单抗单药治疗或联合激光治疗与单纯激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):615-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.031.
3
Diabetic retinopathy.
A Markov model assessing the cost-effectiveness of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and panretinal photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
一种马尔可夫模型,用于评估各种抗血管内皮生长因子药物和全视网膜光凝治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的成本效益。
Eye (Lond). 2025 May;39(7):1364-1372. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03641-4. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Improving outcomes with early and intensive metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a long-term modeling analysis of clinical and cost outcomes in Italy.2型糖尿病患者早期强化代谢控制改善预后:意大利临床及成本效益的长期建模分析
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Jan 29;24(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01553-w. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Association Between Tobacco Smoking and the Development of Diabetic Macular Edema.吸烟与糖尿病性黄斑水肿发生之间的关联。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Aug 31:24741264241269479. doi: 10.1177/24741264241269479.
6
Elevated aqueous TNF-α levels are associated with more severe functional and anatomic findings in eyes with diabetic macular oedema.在患有糖尿病性黄斑水肿的眼睛中,房水肿瘤坏死因子-α水平升高与更严重的功能和解剖学表现相关。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec;52(9):981-990. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14425. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
7
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
8
Burden of Disease Study of Patients with Diabetic Macular Oedema in Spain.西班牙糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的疾病负担研究
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Jul;13(7):1937-1953. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00959-2. Epub 2024 May 21.
9
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 27;2023(6):CD007419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007419.pub7.
10
Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab on diabetic macular oedema in an African population.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗非洲人群糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2777-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03348-z. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
糖尿病视网膜病变。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 10;376(9735):124-36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
4
Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema.随机试验评估雷珠单抗联合即刻或延迟激光或曲安奈德联合即刻激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1064-1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
5
Vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment by better- or worse-seeing eye: clinical trial results from MARINA and ANCHOR.雷珠单抗治疗后较好眼或较差眼的视功能:MARINA 和 ANCHOR 临床试验结果。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):747-56.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.002. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
6
Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Two-year results of the ANCHOR study.雷珠单抗与维替泊芬光动力疗法治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性:ANCHOR研究的两年结果
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):57-65.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.018.
7
The longitudinal link between visual acuity and health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变患者视力与健康相关生活质量之间的纵向联系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 7;6:95. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-95.
8
Health utility values associated with diabetic retinopathy.与糖尿病视网膜病变相关的健康效用值。
Diabet Med. 2008 May;25(5):618-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02430.x. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
9
Clinically significant macular edema and survival in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1型和2型糖尿病患者中具有临床意义的黄斑水肿与生存率
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;145(4):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
10
Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1.雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的随机、双盲、假手术对照试验:PIER研究第1年
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):239-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.004.