Suppr超能文献

雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)致视力损害的成本效果:RESTORE 试验证据。

Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: evidence from the RESTORE trial.

机构信息

Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, 2145 Australia.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;96(5):688-93. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300726. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab as either monotherapy or combined with laser therapy, compared with laser monotherapy, in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment from a UK healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model simulated long-term outcomes and costs of treating DME in one eye (BCVA ≤75 letters) based on data from the RESTORE Phase III trial. Outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were simulated for a 15-year time horizon based on 12-month follow-up from RESTORE and published long-term data. Costs included treatment, disease monitoring, visual impairment and blindness (at 2010 price levels).

RESULTS

Ranibizumab monotherapy resulted in a 0.17 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4191 relative to laser monotherapy, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £24 028. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 64% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Combined ranibizumab and laser therapy resulted in a 0.13 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4695 relative to laser monotherapy (ICER £36 106; 42% probability of ICER <£30 000).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on RESTORE 1-year follow-up data, ranibizumab monotherapy appears to be cost-effective relative to laser monotherapy, the current standard of care. Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy is less certain. Ongoing studies will further inform on disease progression and the need for additional ranibizumab treatment.

摘要

背景/目的:从英国医疗保健支付者的角度评估雷珠单抗单药治疗或联合激光治疗与激光单药治疗相比,治疗视力受损的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的成本效益。

方法

根据 RESTORE III 期试验的数据,采用 Markov 模型模拟长期结局和成本,以治疗一眼 DME(BCVA≤75 个字母)。根据 RESTORE 12 个月随访和已发表的长期数据,以质量调整生命年(QALY)衡量 15 年时间内的结果。成本包括治疗、疾病监测、视力障碍和失明(按 2010 年价格水平计算)。

结果

雷珠单抗单药治疗相对于激光单药治疗,增加了 0.17 个 QALY,增量成本为 4191 英镑,增量成本效益比(ICER)为 24028 英镑。概率敏感性分析显示,在 30000 英镑/QALY 的阈值下,有 64%的可能性具有成本效益。与激光单药治疗相比,联合雷珠单抗和激光治疗增加了 0.13 个 QALY,增量成本为 4695 英镑(ICER 为 36106 英镑;42%的可能性低于 30000 英镑/QALY)。

结论

基于 RESTORE 1 年随访数据,雷珠单抗单药治疗相对于当前的标准治疗激光单药治疗似乎具有成本效益。联合治疗的成本效益不太确定。正在进行的研究将进一步提供关于疾病进展和额外雷珠单抗治疗需求的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c920/3329632/ddefae9fd387/bjophthalmol-2011-300726fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验