Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;134:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
Variation in cardiometabolic risk in prediabetes and any impacts of ethnicity on such variation have been little studied. In an ethnically diverse dataset, selected according to a high-risk HbA1c-based definition of prediabetes, we have investigated relationships between glycaemia and cardiometabolic risk factors and the influence of ethnicity on these relationships.
We undertook a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a diabetes prevention study in the UK and a chronic care clinic in Thailand, selected for people without diabetes (fasting plasma glucose <7.0 mmol/l) with HbA1c 6.0-6.4% (42-47 mmol/mol). Thai (n=158) and UK White (n=600), South Asian (n=112), Black (n=70) and other/mixed (n=103) groups were distinguished and measurements included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), blood pressure (BP), lipids and insulin resistance-related risk factors (IRFs).
Independently of individual characteristics including ethnicity, only systolic BP was weakly associated with FPG (beta coefficient 1.76 (95%CI 0.10-3.42), p 0.03) and only LDL-c with IFG (FPG 5.6 to <7) (adjusted -0.14 (-0.27, -0.003) p 0.04). There were no significant independent associations with cardiometabolic risk factors when categories of impaired fasting glucose (FPG ≥ 6.1 to <7.0 mmol/L) were considered. Relative to White, South Asian ethnicity was independently associated with lower systolic and diastolic BP, Black with lower triglycerides, cholesterol/HDL-c ratio and having 2 or more IRFs, and Thai with lower cholesterol/HDL-c ratio and all three non-white ethnicities with lower total and LDL cholesterol.
In high-risk HbA1c-defined prediabetes additional measurement of FPG will add little to evaluation of cardiometabolic risk. Additionally, UK Whites tend to have the most adverse cardiometabolic profile of any ethnic group.
糖尿病前期患者的心血管代谢风险存在差异,而种族对这种差异的影响则研究较少。本研究在一个根据高风险糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)定义的糖尿病前期人群中,选择了一个种族多样化的数据集,旨在研究血糖与心血管代谢危险因素之间的关系,以及种族对这些关系的影响。
我们对英国糖尿病预防研究和泰国慢性护理诊所的基线数据进行了横断面分析,入选标准为无糖尿病(空腹血糖<7.0mmol/L)且 HbA1c 为 6.0-6.4%(42-47mmol/mol)的人群。根据种族将人群分为泰国人(n=158)和英国白人(n=600)、南亚人(n=112)、黑人(n=70)和其他/混合(n=103)组,检测指标包括空腹血糖(FPG)、血压(BP)、血脂和胰岛素抵抗相关危险因素(IRFs)。
无论种族如何,独立于个体特征,只有收缩压与 FPG 呈弱相关(β系数 1.76(95%CI 0.10-3.42),p=0.03),只有 LDL-c 与 IFG(FPG 5.6 至<7mmol/L)呈负相关(调整后-0.14(-0.27,-0.003),p=0.04)。当考虑到受损空腹血糖(FPG≥6.1 至<7.0mmol/L)的类别时,与心血管代谢危险因素没有显著的独立关联。与白人相比,南亚人独立于其他因素,其收缩压和舒张压较低,黑人的甘油三酯、胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值和存在 2 个或更多 IRFs的比例较低,泰国人的胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值较低,所有三个非白人种族的总胆固醇和 LDL 胆固醇水平较低。
在高风险 HbA1c 定义的糖尿病前期患者中,额外测量 FPG 对评估心血管代谢风险作用不大。此外,英国白人的心血管代谢特征比任何其他种族都更差。