Department of Epidemiology and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):800-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908359.
Fasting glucose is the standard measure used to diagnose diabetes in the United States. Recently, glycated hemoglobin was also recommended for this purpose.
We compared the prognostic value of glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose for identifying adults at risk for diabetes or cardiovascular disease. We measured glycated hemoglobin in whole-blood samples from 11,092 black or white adults who did not have a history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease and who attended the second visit (occurring in the 1990-1992 period) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
The glycated hemoglobin value at baseline was associated with newly diagnosed diabetes and cardiovascular outcomes. For glycated hemoglobin values of less than 5.0%, 5.0 to less than 5.5%, 5.5 to less than 6.0%, 6.0 to less than 6.5%, and 6.5% or greater, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for diagnosed diabetes were 0.52 (0.40 to 0.69), 1.00 (reference), 1.86 (1.67 to 2.08), 4.48 (3.92 to 5.13), and 16.47 (14.22 to 19.08), respectively. For coronary heart disease, the hazard ratios were 0.96 (0.74 to 1.24), 1.00 (reference), 1.23 (1.07 to 1.41), 1.78 (1.48 to 2.15), and 1.95 (1.53 to 2.48), respectively. The hazard ratios for stroke were similar. In contrast, glycated hemoglobin and death from any cause were found to have a J-shaped association curve. All these associations remained significant after adjustment for the baseline fasting glucose level. The association between the fasting glucose levels and the risk of cardiovascular disease or death from any cause was not significant in models with adjustment for all covariates as well as glycated hemoglobin. For coronary heart disease, measures of risk discrimination showed significant improvement when glycated hemoglobin was added to models including fasting glucose.
In this community-based population of nondiabetic adults, glycated hemoglobin was similarly associated with a risk of diabetes and more strongly associated with risks of cardiovascular disease and death from any cause as compared with fasting glucose. These data add to the evidence supporting the use of glycated hemoglobin as a diagnostic test for diabetes.
在美国,空腹血糖是用于诊断糖尿病的标准指标。最近,糖化血红蛋白也被推荐用于此目的。
我们比较了糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖对识别患有糖尿病或心血管疾病风险的成年人的预后价值。我们测量了 11092 名黑人和白人成年人的全血样本中的糖化血红蛋白,这些成年人没有糖尿病或心血管疾病史,并参加了 ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险)研究的第二次访问(发生在 1990-1992 年期间)。
基线时的糖化血红蛋白值与新诊断的糖尿病和心血管结局有关。对于糖化血红蛋白值小于 5.0%、5.0 至小于 5.5%、5.5 至小于 6.0%、6.0 至小于 6.5%和 6.5%或更高,诊断为糖尿病的多变量调整后的危险比(95%置信区间)分别为 0.52(0.40 至 0.69)、1.00(参考)、1.86(1.67 至 2.08)、4.48(3.92 至 5.13)和 16.47(14.22 至 19.08)。对于冠心病,危险比分别为 0.96(0.74 至 1.24)、1.00(参考)、1.23(1.07 至 1.41)、1.78(1.48 至 2.15)和 1.95(1.53 至 2.48)。中风的危险比相似。相比之下,糖化血红蛋白和任何原因导致的死亡呈 J 形关联曲线。在调整基线空腹血糖水平后,所有这些关联仍然显著。在调整所有协变量以及糖化血红蛋白后,空腹血糖水平与心血管疾病或任何原因导致的死亡风险之间的关联并不显著。对于冠心病,当将糖化血红蛋白添加到包含空腹血糖的模型中时,风险评估的准确性得到了显著提高。
在这项基于社区的非糖尿病成年人人群中,糖化血红蛋白与糖尿病风险的相关性相似,与心血管疾病风险和任何原因导致的死亡风险的相关性更强,相比空腹血糖。这些数据增加了支持将糖化血红蛋白用作糖尿病诊断测试的证据。