• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基对科学史普及问题的展望]

[Outlooks of Bogdan Suchodolski on the issue of popularizing the history of science].

作者信息

Lietz Natalia

机构信息

Instytut Historii Nauki PAN, Warszawa.

出版信息

Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2011;56(3-4):37-55.

PMID:22400482
Abstract

The author of the present article proves the veracity of the postulate, which was formulated by Bogdan Suchodolski and concerned the necessity of popularizing the history of science. The stipulation is still greatly important for many fields of human activity. Bogdan Suchodolski was not the first and the only thinker, who revealed the unquestionable significance of disseminating the history of science as scientific branch: For the first time the problem was noticed in 1900 during International Congress of Comparative History in Paris and in 1903 during International Congress of Historical Sciences in Rome, when the idea of universalizing the history of science was put forward, among others, by: Paul Tannery, Carre de Vaux, Gino Ioria and Karl Sudhoff. All the mentioned participants declared then the necessity of teaching the history of science both in the secondary schools and in the universities. In the article was also included a detailed description of conceptions formulated by Paul Tannery and Michel Lhéritier in the inter-war period that concerned popularizing the history of science, and differed much from each other. Unlike Paul Tannery, Michel Lhéritier advised against separating history of science from the whole of history. On the occasion of describing the inter-war period the author is paying a special attention to the role, which was played by International Conference of Teaching History in Hague in 1932. In that time a representative of International Committee on the History of Sciences and International Academy of the History of Sciences--Aldo Mieli--presented the idea of disseminating the history of science, which resulted in a resolution saying that the discussed branch should be taught in the primary and secondary schools, and in the universities as well. Further, the paper includes the description of the detailed conceptions that were put forward after World War II by the members of Committee on Teaching within International Academy of the History of Science and the participants of International Congress of the History of Science in 1965 and in 1968, and concerned the idea of introducing compulsory lectures on the history of science for prospective teachers and lecturers, and the ways of universalizing the discussed branch. The author is also presenting American conceptions of popularizing the history of science that were created by George Sarton, Derek J. de Solla Price and by Committee on University Education that was established in the 1970s. In the article one can find a specific reflection of Bogdan Suchodolski on popularizing the history of science through admitting its social role, making it the main element of educating 'the modern man' and teaching the branch in Poland. The author describes the above-mentioned stipulations in detail. At the same time, the last part of the paper reveals Polish thought in the field of disseminating the history of science in the inter-war period, so in times, when Bogdan Suchodolski was on the point of building his own idea. The author makes an attempt at showing to what extent Bogdan Suchodolski was inspired by one of the most famous Polish originators and precursors of a new branch 'science of science'--Florian Znaniecki. On this occasion the author draws definite conclusions concerning similarities and differences between the conception created by Bogdan Suchodolski, and the ideas that were put forward by his predecessor.

摘要

本文作者证明了由博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基提出的关于普及科学史必要性这一假设的真实性。这一规定对人类活动的许多领域仍然极为重要。博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基并非第一个且唯一揭示将科学史作为一门科学分支进行传播具有毋庸置疑的重要性的思想家:1900年在巴黎召开的国际比较历史大会以及1903年在罗马召开的国际历史科学大会首次注意到了这个问题,当时,保罗·唐内里、卡雷·德·沃、吉诺·伊奥里亚和卡尔·祖德霍夫等人提出了普及科学史的想法。所有上述参会者当时都宣称在中学和大学教授科学史的必要性。文章还详细描述了两次世界大战之间保罗·唐内里和米歇尔·勒里蒂埃提出的关于普及科学史的观念,二者差异很大。与保罗·唐内里不同,米歇尔·勒里蒂埃反对将科学史与整个历史割裂开来。在描述两次世界大战之间的时期时,作者特别关注了1932年在海牙召开的历史教学国际会议所发挥的作用。当时,国际科学史委员会和国际科学史研究院的代表阿尔多·米耶利提出了传播科学史的想法,这导致一项决议称,应在中小学和大学教授这一被讨论的分支。此外,论文还描述了第二次世界大战后国际科学史研究院教学委员会成员以及1965年和1968年国际科学史大会参会者提出的详细观念,这些观念涉及为未来的教师和讲师开设科学史必修课的想法以及普及该讨论分支的方法。作者还介绍了乔治·萨顿、德里克·J·德·索拉·普赖斯以及20世纪70年代成立的大学教育委员会所提出的美国普及科学史的观念。在文章中可以找到博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基对通过承认其社会作用、使其成为培养“现代人”的主要要素以及在波兰教授该分支来普及科学史的具体思考。作者详细描述了上述规定。同时,论文的最后一部分揭示了两次世界大战之间波兰在传播科学史领域的思想,即博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基即将构建自己观念的那个时期的思想。作者试图说明博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基在多大程度上受到了“科学学”这一新分支最著名的波兰创始人及先驱之一弗洛里安·兹南涅茨基的启发。在此之际,作者就博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基所创建的观念与其前辈所提出的观念之间的异同得出了明确结论。

相似文献

1
[Outlooks of Bogdan Suchodolski on the issue of popularizing the history of science].[博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基对科学史普及问题的展望]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2011;56(3-4):37-55.
2
[Conception of the history of science in the interpretation of Bogdan Suchodolski].
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2011;56(1):7-40.
3
[Bogdan Suchodolski--initiator and editor-in-chief of the publication History of Polish Science].[博赫丹·苏霍多尔斯基——《波兰科学史》出版物的发起人和主编]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2011;56(3-4):7-22.
4
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE (NAUKOZNAWSTWO) IN POLAND: THE CHANGING THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES AND POLITICAL CONTEXTS--A HISTORICAL SKETCH FROM THE 1910S TO 1993.波兰的科学学(科学认识学):不断变化的理论视角与政治背景——1910年代至1993年的历史概述
Organon. 2015(47):147-237.
5
[Ludwik Fleck and paradigm of Polish historiography of medicin].
Med Nowozytna. 2004;11(1):33-46.
6
[Lysenkoism in Polish botany].[波兰植物学中的李森科主义]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2008;53(2):83-161.
7
[T.S. Kuhn's methodology and the history of medicine (remarks on the 30th anniversary of the publication of the Polish edition of Kuhn's work)].[托马斯·S·库恩的方法论与医学史(关于库恩著作波兰语版出版30周年的评论)]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 1998;43(3-4):37-65.
8
[Jerzy Kmita's conception of a theoretical history of science as an instrument in the study of the history of medical sciences].[耶日·基米塔将科学理论史视为医学科学史研究工具的概念]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 1998;43(2):45-62.
9
[JEAN EMMANUEL GILIBERT AND FRENCH SCIENTISTS IN POLAND AND LITHUANIA IN 1770-1780].[让·埃马纽埃尔·吉尔伯特与1770 - 1780年在波兰和立陶宛的法国科学家]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2015;60(1):7-16.
10
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.