• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 进食障碍诊断标准的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnostic criteria.

机构信息

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.021
PMID:22401974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3361586/
Abstract

The proposed DSM-5 classification scheme for eating disorders includes both major and minor changes to the existing DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. It is not known what effect these modifications will have on the ability to make reliable diagnoses. Two studies were conducted to evaluate the short-term test-retest reliability of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and feeding and eating conditions not elsewhere classified. Participants completed two independent telephone interviews with research assessors (n=70 Study 1; n=55 Study 2). Fair to substantial agreements (κ=0.80 and 0.54) were observed across eating disorder diagnoses in Study 1 and Study 2, respectively. Acceptable rates of agreement were identified for the individual eating disorder diagnoses, including DSM-5 anorexia nervosa (κ's of 0.81 to 0.97), bulimia nervosa (κ=0.84), binge eating disorder (κ's of 0.75 and 0.61), and feeding and eating disorders not elsewhere classified (κ's of 0.70 and 0.46). Further, improved short-term test-retest reliability was noted when using the DSM-5, in comparison to DSM-IV, criteria for binge eating disorder. Thus, these studies found that trained interviewers can reliably diagnose eating disorders using the proposed DSM-5 criteria; however, additional data from general practice settings and community samples are needed.

摘要

拟议的 DSM-5 饮食障碍分类方案对现有 DSM-IV 诊断标准进行了重大和次要修改。目前尚不清楚这些修改将对可靠诊断的能力产生什么影响。进行了两项研究,以评估拟议的 DSM-5 饮食障碍诊断的短期重测信度:神经性厌食症、神经性贪食症、暴食障碍和未在其他地方分类的喂养和进食障碍。参与者与研究评估员进行了两次独立的电话访谈(研究 1 为 70 人,研究 2 为 55 人)。在研究 1 和研究 2 中,分别观察到饮食障碍诊断的公平到大量一致性(κ=0.80 和 0.54)。确定了个体饮食障碍诊断的可接受一致性率,包括 DSM-5 神经性厌食症(κ 值为 0.81 至 0.97)、神经性贪食症(κ=0.84)、暴食障碍(κ 值为 0.75 和 0.61)和未在其他地方分类的喂养和进食障碍(κ 值为 0.70 和 0.46)。此外,与 DSM-IV 相比,使用 DSM-5 暴食障碍标准时,短期重测信度得到了提高。因此,这些研究发现,经过培训的访谈员可以使用拟议的 DSM-5 标准可靠地诊断饮食障碍;然而,还需要来自一般实践环境和社区样本的额外数据。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability of the proposed DSM-5 eating disorder diagnostic criteria.DSM-5 进食障碍诊断标准的重测信度。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
2
The eating disorder assessment for DSM-5 (EDA-5): Development and validation of a structured interview for feeding and eating disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版饮食失调评估量表(EDA - 5):一种进食与饮食障碍结构化访谈的编制与验证
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Jul;48(5):452-63. doi: 10.1002/eat.22388. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
3
Eating disorders in adolescents: how does the DSM-5 change the diagnosis?青少年饮食失调:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)如何改变诊断方式?
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2015 Nov;27(4):437-41. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2014-0059.
4
Classification of eating disorders: comparison of relative prevalence rates using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria.进食障碍分类:采用 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 标准比较相对患病率。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;206(6):519-20. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.143461. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
5
Do DSM-5 eating disorder criteria overpathologize normative eating patterns among individuals with obesity?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)中关于饮食失调的标准是否过度诊断了肥胖个体的正常饮食模式?
J Obes. 2014;2014:320803. doi: 10.1155/2014/320803. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
6
[Changes to the classification of Eating Disorders in DSM-5].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中饮食失调分类的变化]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2014 Sep;42(5):361-6; quiz 367-8. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000311.
7
The Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (Munich ED-Quest) DSM-5/ICD-10: validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and norms.慕尼黑饮食与喂养障碍问卷(慕尼黑ED-Quest)DSM-5/ICD-10:效度、信度、变化敏感性及常模。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 May;23(3):229-40. doi: 10.1002/erv.2348. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Prevalence and severity of DSM-5 eating disorders in a community cohort of adolescents.DSM-5 饮食障碍在青少年社区队列中的流行率和严重程度。
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Sep;47(6):610-9. doi: 10.1002/eat.22316. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
9
[Diagnostic criteria for eating disorders: what will DSM-5 feature?].[饮食失调的诊断标准:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版将会有哪些特点?]
Nervenarzt. 2011 Sep;82(9):1100-6. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3225-z.
10
Comparing ICD-11 and DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED-Quest).将国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)的饮食失调诊断与慕尼黑饮食和喂养障碍问卷(ED-Quest)进行比较。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Sep;56(9):1826-1831. doi: 10.1002/eat.24010. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Restrictive eating disorders in higher weight persons: A systematic review of atypical anorexia nervosa prevalence and consecutive admission literature.超重人群中的限制型进食障碍:非典型神经性厌食症患病率及连续入院文献的系统综述。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Aug;54(8):1328-1357. doi: 10.1002/eat.23519. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Deficient Goal-Directed Control in a Population Characterized by Extreme Goal Pursuit.目标导向控制不足:一个以极端目标追求为特征的人群。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Mar;33(3):463-481. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01655. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Relationship between Trauma History and Eating Disorders in Adolescents.青少年创伤史与饮食失调之间的关系。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Jul 10;13(4):443-453. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00275-z. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
A narrative review of binge eating disorder in adolescence: prevalence, impact, and psychological treatment strategies.青少年暴饮暴食症的叙述性综述:患病率、影响及心理治疗策略
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Jan 5;9:17-30. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S148050. eCollection 2018.
5
Significant Locus and Metabolic Genetic Correlations Revealed in Genome-Wide Association Study of Anorexia Nervosa.神经性厌食症全基因组关联研究揭示显著基因座与代谢遗传相关性
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 1;174(9):850-858. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121402. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Assessing the psychometric properties of two food addiction scales.评估两种食物成瘾量表的心理测量特性。
Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Reassessment of patients with Eating Disorders after moving from DSM-IV towards DSM-5: a retrospective study in a clinical sample.从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)过渡到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版》(DSM-5)后对饮食失调患者的重新评估:一项临床样本的回顾性研究
Eat Weight Disord. 2016 Dec;21(4):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s40519-016-0314-4. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
8
Deconstructing "Atypical" Eating Disorders: an Overview of Emerging Eating Disorder Phenotypes.解构“非典型”进食障碍:新兴进食障碍表型概述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Nov;17(11):86. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0624-7.
9
Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity indicator for binge eating disorder in a clinical sample.临床样本中暴食症的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版严重程度指标评估。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Aug;71:110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
10
Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity indicator for binge eating disorder in a community sample.在社区样本中对暴食症的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版严重程度指标进行评估。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar;66:72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED) scheme reduce the frequency of eating disorder not otherwise specified?BCD-ED 方案中用于诊断进食障碍的广泛类别是否会减少未特定的进食障碍的频率?
Int J Eat Disord. 2011 Nov;44(7):625-9. doi: 10.1002/eat.20860. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
2
Telephone versus face-to-face administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, for diagnosis of psychotic disorders.电话与面对面使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版定式临床访谈对精神障碍进行诊断的比较。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
A controlled evaluation of the distress criterion for binge eating disorder.暴食障碍苦恼标准的对照评估。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Aug;79(4):509-14. doi: 10.1037/a0024259.
4
Diagnostic efficiency of DSM-IV indicators for binge eating episodes.DSM-IV 指标对暴食发作的诊断效率。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):75-83. doi: 10.1037/a0022210.
5
How do eating disorder specialist clinicians apply DSM-IV diagnostic criteria in routine clinical practice? Implications for enhancing clinical utility in DSM-5.进食障碍专家临床医生如何在常规临床实践中应用 DSM-IV 诊断标准?对增强 DSM-5 临床实用性的启示。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Aug 15;178(3):511-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.021. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
6
Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II).DSM-IV 轴 I 障碍(SCID I)和轴 II 障碍(SCID II)的结构性临床访谈的评定者间信度。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):75-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.693.
7
Validity of routine clinical DSM-IV diagnoses (Axis I/II) in inpatients with mental disorders.精神障碍住院患者常规临床 DSM-IV 诊断(轴 I/II)的有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):252-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.09.009. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
8
Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews.对临床评估诊断与标准化诊断访谈诊断之间一致性的荟萃分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Sep;18(3):169-84. doi: 10.1002/mpr.289.
9
Should non-fat-phobic anorexia nervosa be included in DSM-V?非肥胖恐惧症神经性厌食症是否应纳入 DSM-V?
Int J Eat Disord. 2009 Nov;42(7):620-35. doi: 10.1002/eat.20727.
10
Broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED): an alternative system for classification.用于进食障碍诊断的广泛类别(BCD-ED):一种替代的分类系统。
Int J Eat Disord. 2009 Dec;42(8):754-64. doi: 10.1002/eat.20722.