• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算机的模块对改善避孕方法选择的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based module to improve contraceptive method choice.

机构信息

Public Health Solutions, New York, NY 10013, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2012 Oct;86(4):383-90. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.013
PMID:22402258
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unintended pregnancy is common in the United States, and interventions are needed to improve contraceptive use among women at higher risk of unintended pregnancy, including Latinas and women with low educational attainment.

STUDY DESIGN

A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at two family planning sites serving low-income, predominantly Latina populations. The trial tested the efficacy of a computer-based contraceptive assessment module in increasing the proportion of patients choosing an effective method of contraception (<10 pregnancies/100 women per year, typical use). Participants were randomized to complete the module and receive tailored health materials, to complete the module and receive generic health materials, or to a control condition.

RESULTS

In intent-to-treat analyses adjusted for recruitment site (n=2231), family planning patients who used the module were significantly more likely to choose an effective contraceptive method: 75% among those who received tailored materials [odds ratio (OR)=1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.98] and 78% among those who received generic materials (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.35-2.25), compared to 65% among control arm participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support prior research suggesting that patient-centered interventions can positively influence contraceptive method choice.

摘要

背景

在美国,意外怀孕很常见,需要采取干预措施来提高有较高意外怀孕风险的女性(包括拉丁裔和受教育程度较低的女性)的避孕措施使用率。

研究设计

这项三臂随机对照试验在两个为低收入、以拉丁裔为主的人群提供服务的计划生育点进行。该试验测试了基于计算机的避孕评估模块在增加选择有效避孕方法(每年每 100 名女性<10 例妊娠,典型使用)的患者比例方面的效果。参与者被随机分配到完成模块并接受针对性健康材料、完成模块并接受通用健康材料或对照组。

结果

在按招募地点进行意向治疗分析(n=2231)中,使用该模块的计划生育患者选择有效避孕方法的可能性显著增加:接受针对性材料的患者中为 75%(比值比[OR]=1.56;95%置信区间[CI]:1.23-1.98),接受通用材料的患者中为 78%(OR=1.74;95% CI:1.35-2.25),而对照组参与者中为 65%。

结论

这些发现支持了先前的研究,表明以患者为中心的干预措施可以积极影响避孕方法的选择。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based module to improve contraceptive method choice.基于计算机的模块对改善避孕方法选择的随机对照试验。
Contraception. 2012 Oct;86(4):383-90. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
2
Tailored health messaging improves contraceptive continuation and adherence: results from a randomized controlled trial.定制化健康信息可提高避孕措施的持续使用和依从性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
3
Contraceptive history, unintended pregnancy, and contraceptive method choice among urban low-income women.城市低收入妇女的避孕史、意外怀孕和避孕方法选择。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Nov;22(11):930-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4247. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Contraceptive risk-taking in a medically underserved, low-income population.医疗服务不足的低收入人群中的避孕风险行为。
Soc Biol. 1993 Fall-Winter;40(3-4):248-59.
5
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
6
Factors associated with effective contraceptive use among a sample of Latina women.拉丁裔女性样本中与有效使用避孕措施相关的因素。
Women Health. 2006;43(2):1-16. doi: 10.1300/J013v43n02_01.
7
The free perinatal/postpartum contraceptive services project for migrant women in Shanghai: effects on the incidence of unintended pregnancy.上海外来流动妇女围产期/产后免费避孕服务项目:对意外妊娠发生率的影响
Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Factors determining the choice of contraceptive methods at the Family Planning Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院计划生育诊所避孕方法选择的决定因素
Br J Fam Plann. 1998 Oct;24(3):107-10.
9
Why do Chinese women practice contraception? The case of rural Jilin Province.中国女性为何采取避孕措施?以吉林省农村地区为例。
Stud Fam Plann. 1991 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-51.
10
The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women.低收入女性的计划生育态度与经历
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):246-55, 277.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement in contraceptive knowledge after using an online educational resource.使用在线教育资源后,避孕知识得到提高。
Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110095. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110095. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
Young women's preferences for contraceptive education & development of an online educational resource.年轻女性对避孕教育的偏好及在线教育资源的开发
PEC Innov. 2022 May 2;1:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100046. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Effects of technology-based contraceptive decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于技术的避孕决策辅助工具的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;227(5):705-713.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.050. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.决策辅导:帮助人们做出医疗决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.
5
Participant views and experiences of sexual health research: The online trial.性健康研究的参与者观点与经历:在线试验
Digit Health. 2021 Aug 12;7:20552076211033424. doi: 10.1177/20552076211033424. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.一个互动网站,帮助年轻女性选择避孕方法:可行性和有效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(56):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta24560.
7
Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial.评价一款计算机化的避孕决策辅助工具:一项随机对照试验。
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of .一个用于明智避孕选择的交互式网站:……的随机评估
Digit Health. 2020 Jun 26;6:2055207620936435. doi: 10.1177/2055207620936435. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?关于现代避孕方法咨询策略有效性的系统评价:什么有效,什么无效?
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):254-269. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200377. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.提高短期激素避孕方法依从性和续用率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5.