Divisions of Family Planning & Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 4901 Forest Park Avenue, Mailstop: 8064-37-1005, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 515 Mayo Memorial Building, Moos Tower 12th Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a contraceptive decision aid in reducing decisional conflict among women seeking reversible contraception.
We conducted a randomized trial of a computer-based decision aid compared to a control group for women presenting for reversible contraception at two clinics affiliated with an academic medical center. The primary outcome was change in decisional conflict, measured before and after the healthcare visit using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. We hypothesized the decision aid would reduce the decisional conflict score by 10 points on a 100-point scale (0 = no conflict, 100 = high conflict) compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes included contraceptive method chosen and satisfaction with the healthcare visit.
We enrolled and randomized 253 women, and 241 had complete data for our primary outcome. Overall, pre-visit decisional conflict scores were low, reflecting low levels of decisional conflict in our sample; median score 15 (range 0-80) in the decision aid and 10 (0-85) in the control group (p = 0.45). Both groups had a similar reduction in median decisional conflict after the healthcare visit: -10 (-80 to 25) and -10 (-60 to 5) in the decision aid and control groups respectively (p = 0.99). Choice of contraception (p = 0.23) and satisfaction with healthcare provider (p = 0.79) also did not differ by study group.
Decisional conflict around contraception was low in both groups at baseline. Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict, alter method choice, or impact satisfaction compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception.
Use of a computerized contraceptive decision aid did not reduce decisional conflict or alter method choice compared to the control group among women choosing reversible contraception. Future studies could focus on testing the decision aid in different clinical settings, especially where barriers to providing comprehensive contraceptive counseling exist.
评估避孕决策辅助工具在降低寻求可逆避孕女性决策冲突方面的有效性。
我们对在学术医疗中心附属的两家诊所就诊的 253 名寻求可逆避孕的女性进行了一项基于计算机的决策辅助工具与对照组的随机试验。主要结局是使用经过验证的决策冲突量表在就诊前后测量的决策冲突变化。我们假设与对照组相比,决策辅助工具将使决策冲突评分降低 10 分(0=无冲突,100=高冲突)。次要结局包括选择的避孕方法和对就诊的满意度。
我们共纳入并随机分配了 253 名女性,其中 241 名女性在我们的主要结局中具有完整数据。总体而言,就诊前的决策冲突得分较低,反映了我们样本中的决策冲突程度较低;决策辅助组中位数得分为 15(范围 0-80),对照组中位数得分为 10(0-85)(p=0.45)。两组在就诊后决策冲突的中位数均有类似程度的降低:决策辅助组减少了-10(-80 至 25),对照组减少了-10(-60 至 5)(p=0.99)。避孕方法的选择(p=0.23)和对医疗保健提供者的满意度(p=0.79)在研究组之间也没有差异。
两组在基线时的避孕决策冲突都较低。与对照组相比,在选择可逆避孕的女性中,使用计算机化避孕决策辅助工具并没有降低决策冲突,改变方法选择,或影响满意度。
与对照组相比,在选择可逆避孕的女性中,使用计算机化避孕决策辅助工具并没有降低决策冲突或改变方法选择。未来的研究可以集中在不同的临床环境中测试该决策辅助工具,特别是在提供全面避孕咨询存在障碍的情况下。