Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Mar 8;13(2):3636. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3636.
The purpose of this study is to assess the extent and serial pattern of setup error of conventional fractionated whole pelvic irradiation using a kilovoltage on-board imager. The daily on-board images of 69 patients were matched with the digitally reconstructed radiographs of simulation on the basis of pelvic bony structure. The shifts along x- (lateral), y- (longitudinal), and z- (vertical) axes, and the 3D vector, were measured. The shift between an origin of the first fraction and each fraction (Δshift(1st)) and the shift between an isocenter of simulation and each fraction (Δshift(Sim)) were calculated. To evaluate serial changes, the shifts of each fraction were classified into four consecutive sessions, and an ANOVA and chi-square test were used. The systematic error of the Δshift(Sim) and Δshift(1st) were 2.72 and 1.43 mm along the x-axis, 2.98 and 1.28 mm along the y-axis, and 4.26 and 2.39 mm along the z-axis, respectively. The Δshift(Sim) and Δshift(1st) ≥ 5 mm of the 3D vector occurred in 54.3% and 23.1%, respectively. The recommended margins to cover setup error in case of using Δshift(1st) were 3.81, 3.54, and 6.01 mm along x-, y-, and z-axes, whereas those using Δshift(Sim) were 6.39, 6.95, and 9.95 mm, respectively. With the passage of time, the Δshift(1st) ≥ 5 mm of 3D vector and along any axis in supine setup increased from 14.1% for first session to 22.5% for fourth session (p=0.027) and from 10.8% to 18.5% (p = 0.034), respectively. In prone setup, first session was better than others in the Δshift(1st) ≥ 5 mm of 3D vector and along any axis. It is expected that the correction using the on-board images on the first fraction improves geometrical uncertainties and reduces the margin for target coverage. Daily continuous OBI follow-up during conventional fractionated pelvic irradiation can increase the reproducibility and be more effective in the late period.
本研究旨在评估使用千伏在线成像系统进行常规分割全骨盆照射时的摆位误差程度和序列模式。根据骨盆骨性结构,将 69 名患者的每日在线图像与模拟的数字重建射线照片进行匹配。测量沿 x 轴(侧向)、y 轴(纵向)和 z 轴(垂直)的平移以及 3D 向量。测量从第一分次的原点到每个分次的平移(Δshift(1st))以及从模拟的等中心到每个分次的平移(Δshift(Sim))。为了评估序列变化,将每个分次的平移分为四个连续的分次,使用方差分析和卡方检验进行评估。Δshift(Sim)和Δshift(1st)的系统误差分别沿 x 轴为 2.72mm 和 1.43mm,沿 y 轴为 2.98mm 和 1.28mm,沿 z 轴为 4.26mm 和 2.39mm。3D 向量的Δshift(Sim)和Δshift(1st)≥5mm 分别发生在 54.3%和 23.1%的分次中。如果使用Δshift(1st),则覆盖摆位误差的推荐边缘分别为沿 x、y 和 z 轴 3.81mm、3.54mm 和 6.01mm;如果使用Δshift(Sim),则分别为 6.39mm、6.95mm 和 9.95mm。随着时间的推移,仰卧位时 3D 向量和沿任何轴的Δshift(1st)≥5mm 从第一次分次的 14.1%增加到第四次分次的 22.5%(p=0.027),从 10.8%增加到 18.5%(p=0.034)。在俯卧位中,第一次分次在 3D 向量和沿任何轴的Δshift(1st)≥5mm 方面优于其他分次。预期在第一次分次中使用在线图像进行校正可以提高几何不确定性,并减少靶区覆盖的边缘。在常规分割骨盆照射期间,每天连续使用在线成像系统(OBI)进行随访,可以提高重复性,并在后期更有效。