• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摆位追踪在容积调强弧形治疗中的剂量学影响。

Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics and The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Mar 8;13(2):3707. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3707.

DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3707
PMID:22402386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5716418/
Abstract

The purpose of this work was to determine the dosimetric benefit to normal tissues by tracking the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) apertures with the photon jaws in step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on the Varian 2100 platform. Radiation treatment plans for ten thoracic, three pediatric, and three head and neck cancer patients were converted to plans with the jaws tracking each segment's MLC apertures, and compared to the original plans in a commercial radiation treatment planning system (TPS). The change in normal tissue dose was evaluated in the new plan by using the parameters V5, V10, and V20 (volumes receiving 5, 10 and 20 Gy, respectively) in the cumulative dose-volume histogram for the following structures: total lung minus gross target volume, heart, esophagus, spinal cord, liver, parotids, and brainstem. To validate the accuracy of our beam model, MLC transmission was measured and compared to that predicted by the TPS. The greatest changes between the original and new plans occurred at lower dose levels. In all patients, the reduction in V20 was never more than 6.3% and was typically less than 1%; the maximum reduction in V5 was 16.7% and was typically less than 3%. The variation in normal tissue dose reduction was not predictable, and we found no clear parameters that indicated which patients would benefit most from jaw tracking. Our TPS model of MLC transmission agreed with measurements with absolute transmission differences of less than 0.1% and, thus, uncertainties in the model did not contribute significantly to the uncertainty in the dose determination. We conclude that the amount of dose reduction achieved by collimating the jaws around each MLC aperture in step-and-shoot IMRT is probably not clinically significant.

摘要

本研究旨在通过在瓦里安 2100 平台上使用光子机架跟踪多叶准直器(MLC)射野的步进式调强放疗(step-and-shoot IMRT),确定跟踪多叶准直器(MLC)射野对正常组织的剂量学益处。将 10 例胸部、3 例儿科和 3 例头颈部癌症患者的放疗计划转换为用机架跟踪每个射野的 MLC 射野的计划,并在商业放疗计划系统(TPS)中与原始计划进行比较。通过在累积剂量-体积直方图中使用 V5、V10 和 V20(分别表示接收 5、10 和 20Gy 的体积)参数,评估新计划中正常组织剂量的变化,这些参数来自以下结构:全肺减去大体肿瘤靶区、心脏、食管、脊髓、肝脏、腮腺和脑干。为了验证我们束流模型的准确性,测量了 MLC 透射并与 TPS 预测值进行了比较。原始计划和新计划之间的最大变化发生在较低的剂量水平。在所有患者中,V20 的减少从未超过 6.3%,通常小于 1%;V5 的最大减少为 16.7%,通常小于 3%。正常组织剂量减少的变化不可预测,我们没有发现明确的参数表明哪些患者将从机架跟踪中获益最大。我们的 MLC 透射 TPS 模型与测量值一致,绝对透射差异小于 0.1%,因此,模型中的不确定性不会对剂量确定的不确定性产生显著影响。我们的结论是,在步进式调强放疗中,用机架围绕每个 MLC 射野准直可能不会显著减少剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/c86afc77f963/ACM2-13-136-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/6e4260573de3/ACM2-13-136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/b08c1ad1b96f/ACM2-13-136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/049aa67bb274/ACM2-13-136-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/3c50f351dba7/ACM2-13-136-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/87e63545ca01/ACM2-13-136-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/eb3059c5eee6/ACM2-13-136-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/c86afc77f963/ACM2-13-136-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/6e4260573de3/ACM2-13-136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/b08c1ad1b96f/ACM2-13-136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/049aa67bb274/ACM2-13-136-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/3c50f351dba7/ACM2-13-136-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/87e63545ca01/ACM2-13-136-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/eb3059c5eee6/ACM2-13-136-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5716418/c86afc77f963/ACM2-13-136-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.摆位追踪在容积调强弧形治疗中的剂量学影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Mar 8;13(2):3707. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i2.3707.
2
A comparative study of identical VMAT plans with and without jaw tracking technique.一项关于采用和不采用颌部追踪技术的相同容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划的对比研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):133-141. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6252.
3
Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw techniques in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放射治疗中颌骨追踪技术与静态颌骨技术的剂量学比较
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jan 27;10:28. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0329-4.
4
Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.多叶准直器叶片宽度对头颈部癌症调强放疗的剂量学影响。
Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):021712. doi: 10.1118/1.4860155.
5
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.基于放射生物学指标的螺旋断层放射治疗与基于多叶准直器的调强放射治疗的治疗计划比较
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 7;52(13):3817-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011. Epub 2007 May 31.
6
Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.通过 VMAT 联合下颌追踪技术降低单弧双病灶立体定向放疗中肺剂量的研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 May;20(5):55-63. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12580. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
7
Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.MLC 叶尖模型对商业计划系统的影响:剂量计算限制和 IROC-H 体模失败。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Feb;21(2):82-88. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12819. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Dosimetric impact of the 160 MLC on head and neck IMRT treatments.160 叶片多叶准直器对头颈部调强放疗的剂量学影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 8;15(6):4770. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4770.
9
Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.比较头颈部癌的三维适形放疗(3DCRT)和逆向优化调强放疗(IMRT)计划:静态调强放疗与动态调强放疗技术的等效性
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Nov;77(2):148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.011. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
10
Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.使用三维剂量测定系统分析容积调强弧形放疗中多叶准直器位置误差的直接临床后果。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):296–305. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5515.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Jaw Tracking During Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Facial Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.面颈部非黑素瘤皮肤癌容积旋转调强放疗中下颌跟踪的效果。
In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):849-854. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13510.
2
Influence of Specific Treatment Parameters on Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses in a Phantom Model of Prostate SBRT with CyberKnife and TrueBeam.在使用射波刀和直线加速器的前列腺立体定向体部放疗体模模型中,特定治疗参数对非靶区和射野外剂量的影响
Life (Basel). 2022 Apr 23;12(5):628. doi: 10.3390/life12050628.
3
Dosimetric Importance of Implementing Jaw Tracking Technique in Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Execution.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional and 3D conformal radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: is there a worthwhile quality of life gain?调强放疗与常规及三维适形放疗治疗头颈部肿瘤的比较:是否有值得提高的生活质量?
Cancer Treat Rev. 2011 Nov;37(7):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
2
A comparison of out-of-field dose and its constituent components for intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy: implications for carcinogenesis.调强放射治疗与适形放射治疗的野外剂量及其构成成分比较:致癌风险的意义。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
3
在放射治疗计划执行中实施下颌跟踪技术的剂量学重要性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):1397-1403. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1397.
4
Comparison of combinations of irradiation techniques and jaw conditions in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer.比较肺癌调强放疗中不同照射技术和颌骨条件的组合。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):178-189. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13416. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
5
Estimated radiation doses to ovarian and uterine organs in breast cancer irradiation using radio-photoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs).使用放射性光致发光玻璃剂量计(RPLD)估算乳腺癌放射治疗中卵巢和子宫器官的辐射剂量。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Jun;68(2):167-174. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.445. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy.采用Halcyon和Trilogy调强放疗治疗宫颈癌的计划质量比较。
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;10(24):6135-6141. doi: 10.7150/jca.32500. eCollection 2019.
7
A comparative study of identical VMAT about two adjacent targets with and without fixed-jaw technique.两种不同固定架技术下相邻两靶区等中心容积旋转调强比较研究
Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 8;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1284-2.
8
Dosimetric Comparison Between Jaw Tracking and No Jaw Tracking in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.在调强放射治疗中,下颌追踪与无下颌追踪的剂量学比较。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan 1;18:1533033819841061. doi: 10.1177/1533033819841061.
9
Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.通过 VMAT 联合下颌追踪技术降低单弧双病灶立体定向放疗中肺剂量的研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 May;20(5):55-63. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12580. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
10
Dosimetric superiority of IMRT with jaw tracking technique for whole esophagus and T-shaped field radiotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer.调强放疗联合下颌追踪技术与 T 形野放疗治疗中晚期食管癌的剂量学优势比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0202628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202628. eCollection 2018.
Dosimetric evaluation of 120-leaf multileaf collimator in a Varian linear accelerator with 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams.
在配备6兆伏和18兆伏光子束的瓦里安直线加速器中对120叶多叶准直器进行剂量学评估。
J Med Phys. 2008 Jul;33(3):114-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.42757.
4
Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.第142任务组报告:医用加速器的质量保证
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392.
5
Leaf transmission reduction using moving jaws for dynamic MLC IMRT.使用移动铅门实现动态多叶准直器调强放疗中的射野透射率降低
Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3674-87. doi: 10.1118/1.2768864.
6
Evaluation of dosimetric effect of leaf position in a radiation field of an 80 leaf multileaf collimator fitted to the LINAC head as tertiary collimator.将安装在直线加速器头部作为三级准直器的80叶多叶准直器的辐射野中叶片位置的剂量学效应评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Aug 24;7(3):43-54. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2310.
7
Optimization of collimator parameters to reduce rectal dose in intensity-modulated prostate treatment planning.
Med Dosim. 2005 Winter;30(4):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.06.002.
8
The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗导致致命性继发性恶性肿瘤的计算风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.053.
9
Intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌的调强放射治疗和质子放射治疗
Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Jul;7(4):255-9. doi: 10.1007/s11912-005-0047-4.
10
Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.调强放疗用于非小细胞肺癌时保留肺及其他胸部结构的可行性
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 15;58(4):1268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.085.