Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Vasc Med. 2012 Apr;17(2):85-93. doi: 10.1177/1358863X11436195. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD), and insulin resistance is a key feature of diabetes and pre-diabetes. No longitudinal epidemiological study has examined the relation between insulin resistance and PAD. Our study analyzed the association of quartiles of the homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the development of PAD defined by two methods. PAD was first defined as the development of an abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) (dichotomous outcome) after 6 years of follow-up. PAD was alternatively defined as the development of clinical PAD (time-to-event analysis). The study samples included adults over the age of 65 years who were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, had fasting measurements of insulin and glucose, had ABI measurements, and were not receiving treatment for diabetes. Multivariable models were adjusted for potential confounders, including age, sex, field center and cohort, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol use, and exercise intensity. Additional models adjusted for potential mediators, including blood pressure, lipids, kidney function, and prevalent vascular disease. In the ABI analysis (n = 2108), multivariable adjusted models demonstrated a positive relation between HOMA-IR and incident PAD (odds ratio = 1.80 comparing the 4th versus 1st quartile of HOMA-IR, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.71). In the clinical PAD analysis (n = 4208), we found a similar relation (hazard ratio = 2.30 comparing the 4th versus 1st quartile of HOMA-IR, 95% CI 1.15-4.58). As expected, further adjustment for potential mediators led to some attenuation of effect estimates. In conclusion, insulin resistance is associated with a higher risk of PAD in older adults.
2 型糖尿病是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一个危险因素,胰岛素抵抗是糖尿病和糖尿病前期的一个关键特征。没有纵向的流行病学研究探讨过胰岛素抵抗与 PAD 之间的关系。我们的研究分析了稳态模型胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)四分位数与两种方法定义的 PAD 发展之间的关系。PAD 首先被定义为在 6 年随访后踝臂指数(ABI)异常的发展(二分结果)。PAD 也被定义为临床 PAD 的发展(时间事件分析)。研究样本包括年龄在 65 岁以上的成年人,他们参加了心血管健康研究,有空腹胰岛素和葡萄糖测量值,有 ABI 测量值,并且没有接受糖尿病治疗。多变量模型调整了潜在的混杂因素,包括年龄、性别、现场中心和队列、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟状况、饮酒和运动强度。其他模型还调整了潜在的中介因素,包括血压、血脂、肾功能和已患血管疾病。在 ABI 分析(n=2108)中,多变量调整模型显示 HOMA-IR 与 PAD 发病呈正相关(第 4 四分位与第 1 四分位相比,比值比=1.80,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.20-2.71)。在临床 PAD 分析(n=4208)中,我们发现了类似的关系(第 4 四分位与第 1 四分位相比,风险比=2.30,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.15-4.58)。正如预期的那样,进一步调整潜在的中介因素导致效应估计值略有减弱。总之,在老年人中,胰岛素抵抗与 PAD 风险增加相关。