Editorial: genetics and democracy.
作者信息
Hedlund Maria, Hagen Niclas, Kristoffersson Ulf
机构信息
Department of Political Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
出版信息
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):57-9. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0088-y. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editorial: genetics and democracy.
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):57-9. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0088-y. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
2
Genetics and democracy-what is the issue?遗传学与民主——问题何在？
J Community Genet. 2013 Apr;4(2):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0109-x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Editorial: Democracy is for everyone.
Nurs Mirror Midwives J. 1976 Jun 10;142(24):33.
4
Editorial.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2002 Apr;21(2):1-2.
5
[Editorial: the future of democracy].
Rev Col Nac Enferm. 1968 Jul-Aug;15(4):2-3.
6
Editorial: what is democracy? Voting in recent GNC elections.
Nurs Mirror Midwives J. 1970 Jul 31;131(5):7.
7
Family or democracy - the cover page of our journal - a (resolved) dilemma for our editorial board.
EuroIntervention. 2018 Feb 20;13(14):1619-1621. doi: 10.4244/EIJV13I14A260.
8
A more than one-hundred-fold higher per capita rate of authorship of five democratic nations versus their relatively undemocratic neighboring nations among 6,437 articles in 14 medical journals: does democracy and civil liberties promote intellectual creativity and medical research?在14种医学期刊的6437篇文章中，五个民主国家的人均作者率比其相对不民主的邻国高出一百多倍：民主和公民自由是否能促进智力创造力和医学研究？
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Aug;54(8):1609-20. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0696-x. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Gene technology and democracy.
Science. 1997 Nov 14;278(5341):1207. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1207.
10
STS, symmetry and post-truth.STS，对称性和后真相。
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):593-599. doi: 10.1177/0306312717720308.
本文引用的文献
1
The wide variation of definitions of genetic testing in international recommendations, guidelines and reports.国际建议、指南和报告中基因检测定义的广泛差异。
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):113-24. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0084-2. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
2
Genetic testing legislation in Western Europe-a fluctuating regulatory target.西欧的基因检测立法——一个波动的监管目标。
J Community Genet. 2012 Jan 28;3(2):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0078-0.
3
Definitions of genetic testing in European legal documents.欧洲法律文件中基因检测的定义。
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):125-41. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0077-1. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
4
Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.生物样本库治理：多样化的秩序模式与民主化
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0070-0. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
5
Genetic screening and democracy: lessons from debating genetic screening criteria in the Netherlands.基因筛查与民主：荷兰基因筛查标准辩论的启示
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0063-z. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
6
Is there a doctor in the house? : The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context.家里有医生吗？：直接面向消费者的基因检测环境中医生的存在情况。
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0062-0. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
7
Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy: genetics as scientific progress or political legitimation in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals?权力、专业知识与代议制民主的局限：在药物致癌风险评估中，遗传学是科学进步还是政治合法化？
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0060-2. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
The promises of genomic screening: building a governance infrastructure. Special issue: genetics and democracy.基因组筛查的前景：构建治理基础设施。特刊：遗传学与民主。
J Community Genet. 2012 Apr;3(2):73-7. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0056-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Zotero 插件