Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Mar;86(3):499-507. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0263.
To address the problem of the health impacts of unsafe drinking water, methods are needed to assess microbiologic contamination in water. However, indicators of water quality have provided mixed results. We evaluate five assays (three for Escherichia coli and one each for enterococci and somatic coliphage) of microbial contamination in villages in rural Ecuador that rely mostly on untreated drinking water. Only membrane filtration for E. coli using mI agar detected a significant association with household diarrheal disease outcome (odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.65 in household containers and odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.37) in source samples. Our analysis and other published research points to the need for further consideration of study design factors, such as sample size and variability in measurements, when using indicator organisms, especially when relating water quality exposure to health outcomes. Although indicator organisms are used extensively in health studies, we argue that their use requires a full understanding of their purposes and limitations.
为了解决不安全饮用水对健康的影响问题,需要有方法来评估水中的微生物污染。然而,水质指标的结果并不一致。我们评估了厄瓜多尔农村地区的 5 个村庄(3 个用于检测大肠杆菌,1 个用于检测肠球菌和体腔噬菌体)的微生物污染情况,这些村庄主要依赖未经处理的饮用水。只有使用 mI 琼脂的膜过滤法检测到与家庭腹泻病结果(在家庭容器中,比值比=1.29,95%置信区间=1.02-1.65;在源样本中,比值比=1.18,95%置信区间=1.02-1.37)之间存在显著关联。我们的分析和其他已发表的研究表明,在使用指示生物时,需要进一步考虑研究设计因素,例如样本量和测量的变异性,特别是当将水质暴露与健康结果联系起来时。尽管指示生物在健康研究中得到了广泛应用,但我们认为,在使用它们时,需要充分了解它们的用途和局限性。