Clasen Thomas, Schmidt Wolf-Peter, Rabie Tamer, Roberts Ian, Cairncross Sandy
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT.
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39118.489931.BE. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve the microbial quality of drinking water for preventing diarrhoea.
Systematic review.
Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group's trials register, CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, LILACS; hand searching; and correspondence with experts and relevant organisations.
Randomised and quasirandomised controlled trials of interventions to improve the microbial quality of drinking water for preventing diarrhoea in adults and in children in settings with endemic disease.
Allocation concealment, blinding, losses to follow-up, type of intervention, outcome measures, and measures of effect. Pooled effect estimates were calculated within the appropriate subgroups.
33 reports from 21 countries documenting 42 comparisons were included. Variations in design, setting, and type and point of intervention, and variations in defining, assessing, calculating, and reporting outcomes limited the comparability of study results and pooling of results by meta-analysis. In general, interventions to improve the microbial quality of drinking water are effective in preventing diarrhoea. Effectiveness was not conditioned on the presence of improved water supplies or sanitation in the study setting and was not enhanced by combining the intervention with instructions on basic hygiene, a water storage vessel, or improved sanitation or water supplies--other common environmental interventions intended to prevent diarrhoea.
Interventions to improve water quality are generally effective for preventing diarrhoea in all ages and in under 5s. Significant heterogeneity among the trials suggests that the level of effectiveness may depend on a variety of conditions that research to date cannot fully explain.
评估改善饮用水微生物质量以预防腹泻的干预措施的有效性。
系统评价。
Cochrane传染病组试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学数据库;手工检索;与专家及相关组织通信。
在地方病流行地区,针对改善饮用水微生物质量以预防成人和儿童腹泻的干预措施的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。
分配隐藏、盲法、失访情况、干预类型、结局指标及效应量。在适当亚组内计算合并效应量估计值。
纳入了来自21个国家的33份报告,记录了42项比较。设计、研究背景、干预类型和干预点的差异,以及结局指标的定义、评估、计算和报告方式的差异,限制了研究结果的可比性以及通过Meta分析合并结果的可能性。总体而言,改善饮用水微生物质量的干预措施在预防腹泻方面是有效的。有效性并不取决于研究背景中是否存在改善的供水或卫生设施,并且将该干预措施与基本卫生指导、储水容器、改善的卫生设施或供水(其他旨在预防腹泻的常见环境干预措施)相结合并不会增强效果。
改善水质的干预措施通常对预防各年龄段及5岁以下儿童的腹泻有效。试验之间存在显著异质性,这表明有效性水平可能取决于多种迄今研究尚无法完全解释的条件。