Barnes Virginia Monsul, Arvanitidou Evangelia, Szewczyk Gregory, Richter Rose, DeVizio William, Cronin Matthew, Michelle Schadt
Colgate-Palmolive Technology Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(6):200-3.
The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy in reducing dental plaque regrowth of two mouthwashes containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), one with 6% alcohol and one alcohol-free, as compared to a negative control mouthwash without CPC, using the Modified Gingival Margin Plaque Index (MGMPI).
The study was a double-blind, randomized, three-way crossover, controlled design. Following a washout period, subjects reported to the dental clinic where they were instructed to brush their teeth, used their assigned mouthwash, and were scored by the examining dentist for plaque using the MGMPI method. Subjects were instructed to refrain from all oral hygiene for the next 24 hours, except for rinsing with their assigned mouthwash 12 hours post-brushing. After this 24-hour period, subjects returned to the dental clinic and were once again scored for plaque. This sequence of washout followed by mouthwash use and plaque scoring was repeated until each subject had used all three mouthwashes. An ANOVA was conducted to assess between-group differences.
The two test mouthwashes significantly reduced plaque regrowth over a 24-hour period (p < 0.05) as compared to the negative control mouthwash. The difference between the CPC-containing mouthwashes was not significant (p = 0.4868).
Two mouthwashes containing 0.075% CPC, one with 6% alcohol and the other alcohol-free, were found to be safe and effective in reducing plaque accumulation when compared a negative control mouthwash without CPC. In short-term studies, the MGMPI appears useful for evaluating the antiplaque efficacy of mouthwash products.
本临床研究的目的是使用改良牙龈边缘菌斑指数(MGMPI),评估两种含0.075%西吡氯铵(CPC)的漱口水(一种含6%酒精,另一种不含酒精)与不含CPC的阴性对照漱口水相比,在减少牙菌斑再生长方面的疗效。
该研究采用双盲、随机、三向交叉、对照设计。在洗脱期后,受试者前往牙科诊所,在那里他们被指导刷牙,使用分配给他们的漱口水,检查牙医使用MGMPI方法对菌斑进行评分。受试者被指示在接下来的24小时内避免所有口腔卫生措施,但在刷牙后12小时用分配给他们的漱口水漱口。在这24小时期间后,受试者返回牙科诊所,再次对菌斑进行评分。重复这种先洗脱然后使用漱口水和进行菌斑评分的序列,直到每个受试者使用了所有三种漱口水。进行方差分析以评估组间差异。
与阴性对照漱口水相比,两种测试漱口水在24小时内显著减少了菌斑再生长(p < 0.05)。含CPC的漱口水之间的差异不显著(p = 0.4868)。
与不含CPC的阴性对照漱口水相比,发现两种含0.075% CPC的漱口水(一种含6%酒精,另一种不含酒精)在减少菌斑积聚方面是安全有效的。在短期研究中,MGMPI似乎可用于评估漱口水产品的抗菌斑疗效。