UVA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 500 Ray C Hunt Drive, Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Mar;9(2):147-57. doi: 10.1586/erd.11.74.
Techniques and devices for meniscal repair are evolving, including for all-inside meniscal repair. The first-generation all-inside meniscal repair devices were simplistic in design, but their technical difficulties and risks led to the development of second-generation devices. These devices employed the suture anchor concept for repair and confirmed the safety of use through standard anterior arthroscopic portals. Third-generation devices introduced the idea of rigid, bioabsorbable materials; unfortunately, these demonstrated higher failure and complication rates compared with other repair techniques. They were also limited in their ability to adjust compression and tension across the repair. Now, fourth-generation devices have been developed that are flexible, suture-based, and allow for variable compression and retensioning across the tear. Each device has its own specifications and technical nuances. With a comprehensive understanding of the current devices available, the industry and surgeons may continue in the development of safer, more successful, user-friendly and cost-effective all-inside devices.
半月板修复技术和器械不断发展,包括全内半月板修复技术。第一代全内半月板修复器械设计简单,但由于技术难度大、风险高,催生了第二代器械。第二代器械采用缝合锚定概念进行修复,并通过标准前关节镜入路确认了使用安全性。第三代器械引入了刚性可吸收材料的理念;但不幸的是,与其他修复技术相比,这些器械的失败率和并发症发生率更高。它们在调整修复处的压缩和张力方面也存在局限性。现在,已经开发出第四代器械,这些器械具有柔韧性、基于缝线,并可在撕裂处实现可变的压缩和重新拉紧。每种器械都有其自身的规格和技术细节。通过全面了解现有器械,行业和外科医生可能会继续开发更安全、更成功、更易用、更具成本效益的全内器械。