Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(6):530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.09.002. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
To evaluate whether the evidence-based Body & Soul program, when disseminated and implemented without researcher or agency involvement and support, would achieve results similar to those of earlier efficacy and effectiveness trials.
Prospective group randomized trial.
Churches with predominantly African American membership.
A total of 1,033 members from the 15 churches completed baseline surveys. Of these participants, 562 (54.4%) completed the follow-up survey 6 months later.
Church-based nutrition program for African Americans that included pastoral involvement, educational activities, church environmental changes, and peer counseling.
Daily fruit and vegetable (FV) intake was assessed at pre- and posttest.
Mixed-effects linear models.
At posttest, there was no statistically significant difference in daily servings of FVs between the early intervention group participants compared to control group participants (4.7 vs 4.4, P = .38). Process evaluation suggested that added resources such as technical assistance could improve program implementation.
The disseminated program may not produce improvements in FV intake equal to those in the earlier efficacy and effectiveness trials, primarily because of a lack of program implementation. Program dissemination may not achieve public health impact unless support systems are strengthened for adequate implementation at the church level.
评估基于证据的 Body & Soul 项目在没有研究人员或机构参与和支持的情况下进行传播和实施时,是否会产生与早期疗效和有效性试验相似的结果。
前瞻性组随机试验。
以非裔美国人为主的教会。
共有 15 所教堂的 1033 名成员完成了基线调查。这些参与者中有 562 人(54.4%)在 6 个月后完成了随访调查。
针对非裔美国人的基于教会的营养计划,包括牧师参与、教育活动、教会环境变化和同伴咨询。
评估预测试和后测试时的每日水果和蔬菜(FV)摄入量。
混合效应线性模型。
在后测试时,与对照组参与者相比,早期干预组参与者的每日 FV 摄入量没有统计学上的显著差异(4.7 与 4.4,P =.38)。过程评估表明,增加技术援助等额外资源可以改善计划的实施。
传播的计划可能不会像早期疗效和有效性试验那样,改善 FV 的摄入量,主要是因为计划的实施不足。除非加强支持系统,以在教会层面充分实施,否则计划的传播可能不会产生公共卫生影响。