[Risk of thrombosis in prolonged catheterization of the radial artery: comparison of 2 types of catheters].

The thrombosis rate after long-term cannulation of the radial artery was assessed prospectively in 48 intensive care patients randomly assigned to groupe A (polyethylene Leader-Cath 115-09 catheter; n = 50, aged 55 +/- 20 years, 74% male patients) or groupe B (Teflon Viggo Floswitch 4441 catheter; n = 48, aged 58.6 +/- 16 years, 73% male patients). Bedside angiography was carried out with 10 to 15 ml Hexabrix before removal of the catheter. The two groups were similar with regard to anthropometric parameters, used drugs, pathological events during the stay in ICU, arterial cannulation technique and its duration. There was no case of clinically significant ischaemia. The rate of X-ray total arterial thrombosis was 20% in group A, and 2% in group B (p less than 0.01). There was no difference in the rate of partial thrombosis (54% vs. 41.7% respectively, NS) and of lack of thrombosis (26% vs. 56.3% respectively, NS). The overall rate of thrombosis was greater in group A than in group B, but not significantly (74% vs. 43.7% respectively). The duration of arterial cannulation did not influence the rate of thrombosis. However it was higher in males of Group A than in those of Group B (p less than 0.01), when heparin was not given (p less than 0.05); when vaso-active drugs were used (p less than 0.05); and when the time required for cannula insertion was greater than 5 min (p less than 0.01). It is concluded that Teflon catheters are more biocompatible than polyethylene catheters.